ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2020
A Many-Body, Fully Polarizable Approach to QM/MM Simulations.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- QM/MM Calculated Triplet-Singlet Infrared Difference Spectra of LOV2 Photoreceptor Domains and FMN in Solution.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Density-Functionalized QM/MM Delivers Chemical Accuracy For Solvated Systems.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Seamless integration of GEM, a density based-force field, for QM/MM simulations via LICHEM, Psi4, and Tinker-HP.The Journal of chemical physics · 2024Article
- QM/MM Energy Decomposition Using the Interacting Quantum Atoms Approach.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2022Article
- Biomolecular QM/MM Simulations: What Are Some of the "Burning Issues"?The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2021Article
- Development and application of quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics methods with advanced polarizable potentials.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a new development in quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) methods by replacing conventional MM models with data-driven many-body (MB) representations rigorously derived from high-level QM calculations. The new QM/MM approach builds on top of mutually polarizable QM/MM schemes developed for polarizable force fields with inducible dipoles and uses permutationally invariant polynomials to effectively account for quantum-mechanical contributions (e.g., exchange-repulsion and charge transfer and penetration) that are difficult to describe by classical expressions adopted by conventional MM models. Using the many-body MB-pol and MB-DFT potential energy functions for water, which include explicit two-body and three-body terms fitted to reproduce the corresponding CCSD(T) and PBE0 two-body and three-body energies for water, we demonstrate a smooth energetic transition as molecules are transferred between QM and MM regions, without the need of a transition layer. By effectively elevating the accuracy of both the MM region and the QM/MM interface to that of the QM region, the new QM/MB-MM approach achieves an accuracy comparable to that obtained with a fully QM treatment of the entire system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.