Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33212872›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Seven-Layer Model in Complex Networks Link Prediction: A Survey.

Hui Wang, Zichun Le

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hui WangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.
Zichun LeCollege of Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.

Funding

Special Funding of "the Belt and Road" International Cooperation of Zhejiang Province 2015C04005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Link prediction is the most basic and essential problem in complex networks. This study analyzes the observed topological, time, attributive, label, weight, directional, and symbolic features and auxiliary information to find the lack of connection and predict the future possible connection. For discussion and analysis of the evolution of the network, the network model is of great significance. In the past two decades, link prediction has attracted extensive attention from experts in various fields, who have published numerous high-level papers, but few combine interdisciplinary characteristics. This survey analyzes and discusses the existing link prediction methods. The idea of stratification is introduced into the classification system of link prediction for the first time and proposes the design idea of a seven-layer model, namely the network, metadata, feature classification, selection input, processing, selection, and output layers. Among them, the processing layer divides link prediction methods into similarity-based, probabilistic, likelihood, supervised learning, semi-supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning methods. The input features, evaluation metrics, complex analysis, experimental comparisons, relative merits, common dataset and open-source implementations for each link prediction method are then discussed in detail. Through analysis and comparison, we found that the link prediction method based on graph structure features has better prediction performance. Finally, the future development direction of link prediction in complex networks is discussed.

Indexed as

complex networkslink predictionseven-layer modeltopological features

Identifiers

PMID33212872
PMCPMC7698359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.