The semantics of airborne microbial spread and environmental relevance: Back to Anderson and Cox.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. COVID-19 among infants: key clinical features and remaining controversies.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2024
   Article
2. Disinfection and decontamination in the context of SARS-CoV-2-specific data.Journal of medical virology · 2022
   Review
3. In pursuit of the right tail for the COVID-19 incubation period.Public health · 2021
   Review
4. A Comprehensive Analysis of Maternal and Newborn Disease and Related Control for COVID-19.SN comprehensive clinical medicine · 2021
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Influence of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on COVID-19 pandemic. A review.2020

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as