Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33212013›Full record

ArticleCell systems2021

Inferring Protein Sequence-Function Relationships with Large-Scale Positive-Unlabeled Learning.

Hyebin Song, Bennett J Bremer, Emily C Hinds, Garvesh Raskutti, Philip A Romero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. SHARK enables sensitive detection of evolutionary homologs and functional analogs in unalignable and disordered sequences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Is Novelty Predictable?Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Global epistasis on fitness landscapes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hyebin SongDepartment of Statistics, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16802, USA; Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Bennett J BremerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Emily C HindsDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Garvesh RaskuttiDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Philip A RomeroDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA; Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Electronic address: promero2@wisc.edu.

Funding

Data-driven analysis of protein structure, function, and regulationR35GM119854 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ROMERO, PHILIP ANTHONY · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
Novel Methods for Large Scale Presence only Data in Biological Systems EngineeringR01GM131381 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RASKUTTI, GARVESH · 2018 to 2020
$448k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM131381NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning can infer how protein sequence maps to function without requiring a detailed understanding of the underlying physical or biological mechanisms. It is challenging to apply existing supervised learning frameworks to large-scale experimental data generated by deep mutational scanning (DMS) and related methods. DMS data often contain high-dimensional and correlated sequence variables, experimental sampling error and bias, and the presence of missing data. Notably, most DMS data do not contain examples of negative sequences, making it challenging to directly estimate how sequence affects function. Here, we develop a positive-unlabeled (PU) learning framework to infer sequence-function relationships from large-scale DMS data. Our PU learning method displays excellent predictive performance across ten large-scale sequence-function datasets, representing proteins of different folds, functions, and library types. The estimated parameters pinpoint key residues that dictate protein structure and function. Finally, we apply our statistical sequence-function model to design highly stabilized enzymes.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProteinsAmino Acid SequenceProteinsdeep mutational scanningpositive-unlabeled learningprotein engineeringprotein sequence function relationshipsstatistical learningsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID33212013
PMCPMC7856229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.