Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33212002›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2021

The value of

Golmehr Sistani, Jennifer Bjazevic, Zahra Kassam, Jonathan Romsa, Stephen Pautler

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Imaging in Renal Cell Carcinoma Detection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Translational andrology and urology · 2024
    Article
  10. Molecular Imaging Diagnosis of Renal Cancer UsingDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of small renal masses - Full-text.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Golmehr SistaniLondon Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Jennifer BjazevicLondon Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Zahra KassamLondon Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Jonathan RomsaLondon Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
Stephen PautlerLondon Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
London Health Sciences Centre · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDifferentiation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from oncocytoma is a common diagnostic dilemma. A few studies have shown that

methodsA total of 29 patients with 31 renal masses who had cross-sectional imaging and MIBI SPECT-CT were included. Lesions were categorized as either MIBI-positive or -negative on SPECT-CT. Individual lesion density ranged from 22-56 Hounsfield units (HU) on the non-contrast CT part of SPECT-CT. Quantitative relative MIBI uptake was calculated by measuring tumor to ipsilateral renal parenchymal uptake. The imaging results were correlated with histopathology.

resultsAll oncocytic lesions, including seven oncocytomas and one hybrid oncocytic chromophobe tumor (100%), were positive on MIBI. One chromophobe RCC showed low-grade MIBI uptake. The remaining RCC subtypes, including 15 clear-cell, four papillary, two mixed clear-cell and papillary, and one chromophobe, were MIBI-negative. The quantitative relative tumor uptake showed statistically significant higher uptake in the low-risk/oncocytic lesions compared to RCCs.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that MIBI SPECT-CT is valuable in the characterization of indeterminate renal masses. The combination of MIBI uptake on SPECT and lesion density on non-contrast CT can be used for risk stratification of renal masses. This technique may reduce the need for further imaging (multiphasic CT or magnetic resonance imaging), renal mass biopsy, or surgical resection of low-risk renal masses. Subsequently, more patients could be followed with active surveillance.

Identifiers

PMID33212002
PMCPMC8195571
OpenAlexW3105189736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.