SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2020
Botulinum toxin type A therapy for hemifacial spasm.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Botulinum toxin type A versus anticholinergics for cervical dystonia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Botulinum toxin type A therapy for hemifacial spasm.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of botulinum neurotoxin type A in blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Article
- Trends and off-label use of botulinum toxin type A in Chinese neurological practice from 2016 to 2023: a real-world study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
- Dosage of botulinum toxin in patients undergoing treatment for hemifacial spasm: is there modification during follow-up?Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Article
- Beyond the needle: how clinician expertise affects outcomes in the treatment of hemifacial spasm.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2025Article
- Botulinum toxin type A injections demonstrate remarkable efficacy in treating hemifacial spasm in elderly patients.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- [An analysis of clinical efficacy of microvascular decompression for 21 inpatients suffering from primary hemifacial spasm].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2024Article
- Evaluating magnetic resonance imaging characteristics and risk factors for hemifacial spasm.Brain and behavior · 2024Article
- Article
- Clinical Application of Botulinum Toxin for Hemifacial Spasm.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Genetic Screening of a Hungarian Cohort with Focal Dystonia Identified Several Novel Putative Pathogenic Gene Variants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Hemifacial spasm is not affected by state of consciousness: a case report.European journal of medical research · 2021Article
- Botulinum Toxin in Movement Disorders: An Update.Toxins · 2021Review
- Mind the gap: a German case study on the discrepancy between geographic accessibility and real-world utilization of botulinum toxin therapy.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis is an update of a Cochrane Review, first published in 2005. Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is characterised by unilateral, involuntary contractions of the muscles innervated by the facial nerve. It is a chronic disorder, and spontaneous recovery is very rare. The two treatments routinely available are microvascular decompression and intramuscular injections with botulinum toxin type A (BtA).
objectivesTo compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of BtA versus placebo in people with HFS. SEARCH
methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, reference lists of articles, and conference proceedings in July 2020. We ran the electronic database search, with no language restrictions, in July 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA: Double-blind, parallel, randomised, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of BtA versus placebo in adults with HFS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed records. We planned to select included studies, extract data using a paper pro forma, and evaluate the risk of bias. We resolved disagreements by consensus, or by consulting a third review author. We planned to perform meta-analyses. The primary efficacy outcome was HFS-specific improvement. The primary safety outcome was the proportion of participants with any adverse event. MAIN
resultsWe found no parallel-group randomised controlled trials comparing BtA and placebo in HFS. AUTHORS'
conclusionsWe did not find any randomised trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in people with hemifacial spasm, so we are unable to draw any conclusions. Observational data show a strong association between BtA treatment and symptom improvement, and a favourable safety profile. While it is unlikely that future placebo-controlled RCTs will evaluate absolute efficacy and safety, they should address relevant questions for both people with HFS (such as long-term effects, quality of life, and other patient-reported outcomes), and clinicians (such as relative effectiveness of different BtA formulations and schemes of treatment) to better guide clinical practice.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.