Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33211870›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2021

Denosumab Safety and Efficacy Among Participants in the FREEDOM Extension Study With Mild to Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease.

Aaron Broadwell, Arkadi Chines, Peter R Ebeling, Edward Franek, Shuang Huang, Shawna Smith, David Kendler, Osvaldo Messina, Paul D Miller

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00089791 phase3completednot on this map

A Study to Evaluate Denosumab in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis FREEDOM (Fracture REduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis Every 6 Months)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2004 to 2008Enrolled7,808ConditionsOsteoporosisArmsplacebo, Denosumab
NCT00523341 phase3completednot on this map

An Open Label, Single Arm, Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Sustained Efficacy of Denosumab (AMG162) in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2007 to 2015Enrolled4,550ConditionsOsteopenia, OsteoporosisArmsDenosumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Trends in serum phosphate, calcium, and parathyroid hormone levels according to renal function following denosumab.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Observational
  13. Denosumab discontinuation in the clinic: implications of rebound bone turnover and emerging strategies to prevent bone loss and fractures.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab: Insights beyond 10 Years of Use.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Aaron BroadwellRheumatology and Osteoporosis Specialists, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.
Arkadi ChinesAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
Peter R EbelingMonash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Edward FranekMossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Shuang HuangAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
Shawna SmithAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
David KendlerUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Osvaldo MessinaUniversity of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Paul D MillerColorado Center for Bone Research, Lakewood, Colorado, USA.
Amgen (United States) · USColorado Center for Bone Research · USDermatology Specialists · USMonash University · AUMossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLUniversidad de Buenos Aires · ARUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe effects of long-term exposure to denosumab in individuals with renal insufficiency are unknown.

objectiveThis post hoc analysis evaluates the long-term safety and efficacy of denosumab in individuals with mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD) (stages 2 and 3) using data from the pivotal phase 3, double-blind, 3-year FREEDOM (NCT00089791) and open-label, 7-year extension (NCT00523341) studies. PARTICIPANTS AND

methodsWomen age 60 to 90 years with a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score of less than -2.5 to greater than -4.0 at the total hip or lumbar spine were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months (long-term arm) or placebo (cross-over arm) in FREEDOM; eligible participants could enroll in the extension to receive denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months. Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from study baseline and annualized rates of fracture and adverse events (AEs) were the main outcome measures.

resultsMost participants (1259/1969 [64%] long-term arm; 1173/1781 [66%] crossover arm) with baseline CKD stage 2 or 3 remained within the same CKD subgroup at study completion; less than 3% progressed to CKD stage 4. Participants in all eGFR subgroups showed similar, persistent BMD gains over time and a low incidence of fractures. The percentage of participants reporting serious AEs was similar among renal subgroups (normal, CKD stage 2, CKD stage 3a, CKD stage 3b) both for the long-term (54% vs 52% vs 57% vs 58%) and crossover (43% vs 42% vs 43% vs 68%) arms, except CKD stage 3b subgroup, crossover arm.

conclusionThe safety and efficacy of denosumab did not differ among participants with mild to moderate CKD.

Indexed as

Bone DensityAgedAged, 80 and overBone Density Conservation AgentsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCross-Over StudiesDenosumabDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFractures, BoneGlobal HealthHumansHypocalcemiaMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabbone mineral densitychronic kidney diseasedenosumabfracturesafety

Identifiers

PMID33211870
PMCPMC7823314
OpenAlexW3102497255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.