Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33211741›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Assessment of laying-bird welfare following acaricidal treatment of a commercial flock naturally infested with the poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae).

Déborah Temple, Xavier Manteca, Damián Escribano, Marina Salas, Eva Mainau, Eva Zschiesche, Ivo Petersen, Roser Dolz, Emmanuel Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Spatial Distribution ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The Relationships between Damaging Behaviours and Health in Laying Hens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Déborah TempleSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier MantecaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Damián EscribanoSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Marina SalasSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Eva MainauSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Eva ZschiescheMSD Animal Health GmbH, Zur Propstei, Schwabenheim, Germany.
Ivo PetersenMSD Animal Health GmbH, Zur Propstei, Schwabenheim, Germany.
Roser DolzMSD Animal Health, Calle de Josepha de Valcárcel, Madrid, Spain.
Emmanuel ThomasMSD Animal Health GmbH, Zur Propstei, Schwabenheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9532-8161

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The poultry red mite (PRM), Dermanyssus gallinae, a potential vector of pathogens to animals and humans, causes impaired bird welfare. A study investigated changes in behavioural variables, physiological biomarkers, and health parameters following acaricidal treatment of PRM infestation of laying hens on a commercial farm. Mite traps determined the challenge to 12,700 hens before and after drinking water administration of the acaricide, fluralaner (Exzolt®, 0.5 mg/kg; Weeks 0 and 1). Weekly daytime direct observations and night-time video recordings monitored bird behaviours from Weeks -6 through +6. Blood samples were collected from randomly-selected birds (Weeks -6, -1, and +6). Following treatment, mite count reductions (>99%) were statistically significant (P < 0.0001), as were night-time reductions in the percent of hens showing activity, preening, head scratching (all P < 0.0001), and head shaking (P = 0.0007). Significant daytime reductions were observed in preening and head scratching (both P < 0.0001), head shaking (P = 0.0389), severe feather pecking (P = 0.0002), and aggressive behaviour (P = 0.0165). Post-treatment, comb wounds were significantly reduced (P = 0.0127), and comb colour was significantly improved (P < 0.0001). Heterophil/lymphocyte ratio was significantly reduced at Weeks 1 and 6 (P = 0.0009 and P < 0.0001, respectively). At Week 6, blood corticosterone (P = 0.0041) and total oxidant status (P < 0.0001) were significantly reduced, and haemoglobin and mean corpuscular haemoglobin significantly increased (P < 0.0001). Farm production records indicated that those post-treatment improvements were accompanied by significant reductions in weekly mortality rate (P = 0.0169), and significant recovery in mean weekly egg weights (P < 0.0001) and laying rate (P < 0.0001). The improvements in behavioural variables, physiological biomarkers, and health parameters that were observed following the elimination of PRM on a commercial farm indicate that infestations can be a cause of reduced hen welfare.

Indexed as

AcariAcaricidesAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleHemoglobinsIsoxazolesLymphocyte CountPoultryPoultry DiseasesReproductionA1443 compoundAcaricidesHemoglobinsIsoxazoles

Identifiers

PMID33211741
PMCPMC7676655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.