Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33211740›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Altered kinetics of circulating progenitor cells in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) associated vasoplegic patients: A pilot study.

Sanhita Nandi, Uma Rani Potunuru, Chandrani Kumari, Abel Arul Nathan, Jayashree Gopal, Gautam I Menon, Rahul Siddharthan, Madhulika Dixit, Paul Ramesh Thangaraj

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sanhita NandiLaboratory of Vascular Biology, Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.
Uma Rani PotunuruApollo Hospitals Educational and Research Foundation, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8331-0017
Chandrani KumariThe Institute of Mathematical Sciences (HBNI), Chennai, India.
Abel Arul NathanLaboratory of Vascular Biology, Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7203-6104
Jayashree GopalDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8951-4726
Gautam I MenonThe Institute of Mathematical Sciences (HBNI), Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5528-4002
Rahul SiddharthanThe Institute of Mathematical Sciences (HBNI), Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2233-0954
Madhulika DixitLaboratory of Vascular Biology, Department of Biotechnology, Bhupat and Jyoti Mehta School of Biosciences, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1898-0479
Paul Ramesh ThangarajDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2407-0807
Indian Institute of Technology Madras · INApollo Hospitals · INInstitute of Mathematical Sciences · INApollo Hospitals · INAshoka University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vasoplegia observed post cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with substantial morbidity, multiple organ failure and mortality. Circulating counts of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) are potential markers of neo-vascularization and vascular repair. However, the significance of changes in the circulating levels of these progenitors in perioperative CPB, and their association with post-CPB vasoplegia, are currently unexplored. We enumerated HSC and EPC counts, via flow cytometry, at different time-points during CPB in 19 individuals who underwent elective cardiac surgery. These 19 individuals were categorized into two groups based on severity of post-operative vasoplegia, a clinically insignificant vasoplegic Group 1 (G1) and a clinically significant vasoplegic Group 2 (G2). Differential changes in progenitor cell counts during different stages of surgery were compared across these two groups. Machine-learning classifiers (logistic regression and gradient boosting) were employed to determine if differential changes in progenitor counts could aid the classification of individuals into these groups. Enumerating progenitor cells revealed an early and significant increase in the circulating counts of CD34+ and CD34+CD133+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) in G1 individuals, while these counts were attenuated in G2 individuals. Additionally, EPCs (CD34+VEGFR2+) were lower in G2 individuals compared to G1. Gradient boosting outperformed logistic regression in assessing the vasoplegia grouping based on the fold change in circulating CD 34+ levels. Our findings indicate that a lack of early response of CD34+ cells and CD34+CD133+ HSCs might serve as an early marker for development of clinically significant vasoplegia after CPB.

Indexed as

Blood Cell CountEndothelial Progenitor CellsHematopoietic Stem CellsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAnthropometryCardiopulmonary BypassComorbidityElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIntraoperative PeriodAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID33211740
PMCPMC7676651
OpenAlexW3101237921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.