Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33211697›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Personality profiles and meteoropathy intensity: A comparative study between young and older adults.

Marcin Rzeszutek, Włodzimierz Oniszczenko, Iwona Zalewska, Małgorzata Pięta

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcin RzeszutekFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4230-3806
Włodzimierz OniszczenkoFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4442-9186
Iwona ZalewskaFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Małgorzata PiętaFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1914-9556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study's main aims were to investigate the Big Five personality trait heterogeneity of study participants in two age groups and to examine whether these traits' heterogeneity can explain possible individual differences in meteoropathy intensity.

methodThe sample was comprised of 758 participants divided into two age groups: 378 young adults (18-30 years old) and 380 older adults (60+ years old). The participants filled out online or paper versions of the METEO-Q questionnaire and the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI).

resultsA latent profile analysis of the completed inventories showed various personality profiles differ in meteoropathy intensity. However, personality's differentiating effect on meteoropathy was observed only among the young adult group.

conclusionsOur study's results indicate that there is no one personality trait pattern that fits all individuals regarding sensitivity to weather changes. This issue is especially visible when considering age differences.

Indexed as

Personality InventoryAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33211697
PMCPMC7676684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.