Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33211590›Full record

ReviewJournal of women's health (2002)2021

U.S. Maternal Mortality Within a Global Context: Historical Trends, Current State, and Future Directions.

Regine A Douthard, Iman K Martin, Theresa Chapple-McGruder, Ana Langer, Soju Chang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of women's health (2002), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Trends in maternal mortality rates by state, United States, 2018 to 2023.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Pregnancy-related death rates by county, race, and ethnicity in the US, 2000-2019.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Regine A DouthardOffice of Research on Women's Health, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Iman K MartinDivision of Blood Diseases and Resources, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Theresa Chapple-McGruderDivision of Healthy Start and Perinatal Services, Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Ana LangerDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Soju ChangDivision of Clinical Innovation, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States, despite significant investment and the efforts of multiple maternal health stakeholders, maternal mortality (MM) has reemerged since 1987 and MM disparity has persisted since 1935. This article provides a review of the U.S. MM trajectory throughout its history up to its current state. From this longitudinal perspective, MM trends and themes are evaluated within a global context in an effort to understand the problems and contributing factors. This article describes domestic and worldwide strategies recommended by maternal health stakeholders to reduce MM.

Indexed as

Maternal MortalityFemaleHumansUnited Statesdisparityglobal contextmaternal mortalitystrategiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33211590
PMCPMC8020556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.