Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33211575›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2021

Evaluating the National Institutes of Health's Sex as a Biological Variable Policy: Conflicting Accounts from the Front Lines of Animal Research.

Margaret Waltz, Jill A Fisher, Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Rebecca L Walker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An Ethics and Social-Justice Approach to Collecting and Using Demographic Data for Psychological Researchers.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Margaret WaltzDepartment of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jill A FisherDepartment of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Anne Drapkin LyerlyDepartment of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Rebecca L WalkerDepartment of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Healthy Volunteers as Model Organisms: Comparative Research Ethics and Policy for Phase I trialsR01GM099952 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FISHER, JILL A, WALKER, REBECCA · 2012 to 2020
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Animal ExperimentationBiomedical ResearchAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)PolicySex FactorsUnited Statesanimal researchersNational Institutes of Healthpolicypreclinical researchsex as a biological variablewomen's health

Identifiers

PMID33211575
PMCPMC7957378
OpenAlexW3100001277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.