SynthesisAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2020
Image Overlay Surgery Based on Augmented Reality: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Augmented Reality Technology in Cosmetic Rhinoplasty: A Feasibility Study.Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicine · 2026Article
- Usability Study of Augmented Reality Visualization Modalities on Localization Accuracy in the Head and Neck: Randomized Crossover Trial.JMIR serious games · 2026Article
- Depth-based registration of 3D preoperative models to intraoperative patient anatomy using the HoloLens 2.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- A novel smartphone augmented reality-based solution for small intracranial lesion localization with refined reference markers.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Augmented Reality in Dentistry: Enhancing Precision in Clinical Procedures-A Systematic Review.Clinics and practice · 2024Review
- Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Navigation-Assisted Surgery for Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancer: The NAVI-LARRC Trial.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Urology: a trip into metaverse.World journal of urology · 2023Review
- Effect of marker position and size on the registration accuracy of HoloLens in a non-clinical setting with implications for high-precision surgical tasks.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021Article
- Augmented Reality to Assist Skin Paddle Harvesting in Osteomyocutaneous Fibular Flap Reconstructive Surgery: A Pilot Evaluation on a 3D-Printed Leg Phantom.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Metastatic cancer detection and management with artificial intelligence and augmented reality (Review).Medicine internationalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Augmented Reality (AR) applied to surgical guidance is gaining relevance in clinical practice. AR-based image overlay surgery (i.e. the accurate overlay of patient-specific virtual images onto the body surface) helps surgeons to transfer image data produced during the planning of the surgery (e.g. the correct resection margins of tissue flaps) to the operating room, thus increasing accuracy and reducing surgery times. We systematically reviewed 76 studies published between 2004 and August 2018 to explore which existing tracking and registration methods and technologies allow healthcare professionals and researchers to develop and implement these systems in-house. Most studies used non-invasive markers to automatically track a patient's position, as well as customised algorithms, tracking libraries or software development kits (SDKs) to compute the registration between patient-specific 3D models and the patient's body surface. Few studies combined the use of holographic headsets, SDKs and user-friendly game engines, and described portable and wearable systems that combine tracking, registration, hands-free navigation and direct visibility of the surgical site. Most accuracy tests included a low number of subjects and/or measurements and did not normally explore how these systems affect surgery times and success rates. We highlight the need for more procedure-specific experiments with a sufficient number of subjects and measurements and including data about surgical outcomes and patients' recovery. Validation of systems combining the use of holographic headsets, SDKs and game engines is especially interesting as this approach facilitates an easy development of mobile AR applications and thus the implementation of AR-based image overlay surgery in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33211313What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.