Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33211251›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2021

Comparison of the Conox (qCON) and Sedline (PSI) depth of anaesthesia indices to predict the hypnotic effect during desflurane general anaesthesia with ketamine.

Catherine Christenson, Pablo Martinez-Vazquez, Max Breidenstein, Borzoo Farhang, Jackson Mathews, Umberto Melia, Erik Weber Jensen, Donald Mathews

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05969483 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Validation of a Processed EEG Device (pEEG, Masimo Sedline®) as a Monitoring Tool for the Analgosedation Level in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Children

TypeobservationalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliera di PadovaRan2022 to 2025Enrolled150ConditionsSedation ComplicationArmspEEG monitoring
NCT06249113 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Adjuvant Continuous Lidocaine in General Anesthesia on Depth of Anesthesia (qCON), Pain Response (qNOX), and Blood Sugar Levels in Elective Primary Tumor Craniotomy Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsSurgery, Anesthesia, Functional, Haemodynamic InstabilityArmsNaCl 0.9%, Adjuvant lidocaine continous
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Catherine ChristensonUniversity of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA.
Pablo Martinez-VazquezQuantium Medical, Mataro, Barcelona, Spain. pmvazquez@dpz.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2744-5291
Max BreidensteinUniversity of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA.
Borzoo FarhangUniversity of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA.
Jackson MathewsUniversity of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA.
Umberto MeliaQuantium Medical, Mataro, Barcelona, Spain.
Erik Weber JensenQuantium Medical, Mataro, Barcelona, Spain.
Donald MathewsUniversity of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA.
University of Vermont Medical Center · USFresenius (Germany) · DEGerman Primate Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparison of two depth of anesthesia indices, qCON (Conox) and PSI (Sedline), during desflurane sedation and their sensitivity to random ketamine boluses in patients undergoing routine surgery. The performance of desflurane and ketamine on both indices was analyzed for 11 patients, and the ketamine sensitivity was compared with another group of 11 patients under sevoflurane and propofol.The MOAA/S was used to determine sedation level and pain. Different boluses of ketamine ranging from 10 to 30 mg where randomly administered in both groups and the effect on the indexes were measured after 4 min.The indices were recorded during the whole surgery, and their correlations with the desflurane concentration and the discrimination between awake and anesthetized states were evaluated with the prediction probability statistic (Pk). The Pk values, mean (se), discriminating between awake and anesthetized states were 0.974(0.016) for the qCON and 0.962(0.0123) for the PSI, while the 1-Pk statistic for the qCON and the PSI with respect to the desflurane concentration were 0.927(0.016) and 0.918(0.018), respectively, with no statistically significant differences.The agreement between both depth of hypnosis parameters was assessed under the Bland-Altman plot and the Spearman correlation, r

Indexed as

Anesthetics, InhalationIsofluraneKetamineMethyl EthersPropofolAnesthesia, GeneralDesfluraneHumansHypnotics and SedativesAnesthetics, InhalationDesfluraneHypnotics and SedativesIsofluraneKetamineMethyl EthersPropofolAnesthesiaDepthEEGKetaminePropofolSevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID33211251
OpenAlexW3104366300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.