ArticleVirus genes2021
Tomato yellow vein streak virus and Tomato golden vein virus: a reappraisal of the classification status of two South American Begomovirus species based upon genome-wide pairwise identity of multiple isolates.
Article in Virus genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reexamining a Host-Associated Genomic Diversity of Bean Golden Mosaic Virus (BGMV) Isolates fromPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Tomato golden net virus and tomato yellow net virus: two novel New World begomoviruses with monopartite genomes.Archives of virology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tomato yellow vein streak virus (ToYVSV) and tomato golden vein virus (TGVV) are begomoviruses reported infecting tomatoes and other hosts across South America. However, their close phylogenetic relationship has generated uncertainties about their taxonomic status and nomenclature. In fact, genomic DNA-A identity levels of isolates reported with an identical virus name may range from 89-100%. In view of the potential inaccuracy regarding the classification status of these viruses (strains vs. distinct species), we carried out a comprehensive set of analyses employing all 45 available isolates with complete DNA-A sequences with either ToYVSV or TGVV designation. Two clear-cut clusters were identified and they were consistent with the current criteria for Begomovirus species demarcation. Moreover, our reappraisal confirmed a large array of misnamed isolates and recognized a distinctive set of virus species-specific genomic, biological, and ecological features. Hence, the present work gives support to the notion that these viruses are closely-related, but they are distinct and valid Begomovirus species. From the breeding standpoint, this information will be useful in guiding germplasm screening strategies searching for sources of large-spectrum resistance to isolates of both viruses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33211226What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.