Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33211205›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2021

Standardized fluoroscopy-guided implantation technique enables optimal electrode placement in sacral neuromodulation: a cadaver study.

C Müller, L F Reissig, S Argeny, W J Weninger, S Riss

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04726904 (Best Surgical Technique for Optimal Lead Placement in Sacral Neuromodulation - a Comparative Cadaver Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04726904 naunknown statusnot on this map

Best Surgical Technique for Optimal Lead Placement in Sacral Neuromodulation - a Comparative Cadaver Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of ViennaRan2020 to 2021Enrolled5ConditionsFaecal IncontinenceArmsSacral neuromodulation in conventional implantation technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C MüllerDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4183-8163
L F ReissigDivision of Anatomy, MIC Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
S ArgenyDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
W J WeningerDivision of Anatomy, MIC Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
S RissDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. stefan.riss@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an established treatment option for patients with faecal incontinence. The location of the stimulating electrode is considered to be essential for treatment success. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the position of SNM electrodes after using a standardized fluoroscopy-guided implantation technique.

methodsFor this cadaver study, SNM electrodes were implanted bilaterally in 5 lower body specimens. The lower edge of the sacroiliac joint and the medial edge of the sacral foramina were marked using fluoroscopy to draw an 'H' with the crossing points identifying S3. After electrode placement the pelvis was dissected to describe the exact position of the SNM electrodes.

resultsThe electrodes were inserted at an angle with a median degree measure of 60° (range 50-65°) to the skin, with a median distance of 9 mm (range 0-13 mm) from the S3 marking. All electrodes entered the third sacral foramen. The median distance of the electrodes to the sacral nerve was 0 mm (range 0-3 mm) for the most proximal, 0.5 mm (range 0-5 mm) for the second, 2.25 mm (range 0-11 mm) for the third and 1.75 mm (range 0-16 mm) for the most distant electrode. There was neither a significant difference in the proximity of the electrodes to the nerve between the right and left side (proximal to distal electrode: p = 0.18, p = 0.16, p = 0.07, p = 0.07) nor between male and female cadavers (p = 0.25, p = 0.21, p = 0.66, p = 0.66).

conclusionsA standardized fluoroscopy-guided implantation technique enables a close contact between electrode and nerve. This can potentially result in an improved clinical outcome.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapySacrumCadaverElectrodesElectrodes, ImplantedFemaleFluoroscopyHumansLumbosacral PlexusMaleTreatment OutcomeAnatomical landmarksElectrode localizationFaecal incontinenceLead placementSacral neuromodulationTreatment success

Identifiers

PMID33211205
PMCPMC7884365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.