Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33211152›Full record

Trial reportWiener klinische Wochenschrift2021

The positive effect of spermidine in older adults suffering from dementia : First results of a 3-month trial.

Thomas Pekar, Katharina Bruckner, Susanne Pauschenwein-Frantsich, Anna Gschaider, Martina Oppliger, Julia Willesberger, Petra Ungersbäck, Aribert Wendzel, Alexandra Kremer, Walter Flak and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas PekarBiomedical Science, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Johannes-Gutenberg-Str. 3, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria. pekar@fhwn.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2331-0488
Katharina BrucknerBiomedical Science, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Johannes-Gutenberg-Str. 3, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Susanne Pauschenwein-FrantsichBiomedical Science, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Johannes-Gutenberg-Str. 3, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Anna GschaiderBiomedical Science, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Johannes-Gutenberg-Str. 3, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Martina OppligerBiomedical Science, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Johannes-Gutenberg-Str. 3, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Julia WillesbergerBiomedical Science, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Johannes-Gutenberg-Str. 3, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Petra UngersbäckBiomedical Science, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Johannes-Gutenberg-Str. 3, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Aribert WendzelGepflegt Wohnen GmbH, 182, 8412, Allerheiligen bei Wildon, Austria.
Alexandra KremerPrivatklinik Rudolfinerhaus GmbH, Billrothstr. 78, 1190, Vienna, Austria.
Walter FlakFederal Office for Viticulture, Gölbeszeile 1, 7000, Eisenstadt, Austria.
Felix WantkeFAZ Floridsdorfer Allergiezentrum, Pius-Parsch-Platz 1/3, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Reinhart JarischFAZ Floridsdorfer Allergiezentrum, Pius-Parsch-Platz 1/3, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Fachhochschule Wiener Neustadt · ATAllergiezentrum Wien West · ATRudolfinerhaus Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The worldwide prevalence of dementia is estimated at 35.6 million and will rise to 115 million by 2050. There is therefore an urgent need for well-founded dementia diagnostics and well-researched therapeutic options. Previous studies have highlighted that spermidine has the ability to trigger the important process of dissolving amyloid-beta plaques by autophagy. They also confirmed that nutritional intervention with the natural polyamine spermidine can prevent memory loss in aging model organisms. This multicentric double-blind preliminary study focused on the effect of oral spermidine supplementation on older adults' cognitive performance. Memory tests were carried out on 85 subjects aged between 60 and 96 years in 6 nursing homes in Styria. Blood samples were taken for the determination of spermidine concentration and measurement of metabolic parameters. The results demonstrated a clear correlation between the intake of spermidine and the improvement in cognitive performance in subjects with mild and moderate dementia in the group treated with the higher spermidine dosage. The most substantial improvement in test performance was found in the group of subjects with mild dementia with an increase of 2.23 points (p = 0.026) in the mini mental state examination (MMSE) and 1.99 (p = 0.47) in phonematic fluidity. By comparison, the group which had a lower spermidine intake showed consistent or declining cognitive performance.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDementiaAgedAged, 80 and overAgingHumansMemoryMental Status and Dementia TestsMiddle AgedSpermidineSpermidineAlzheimerʼs diseaseCERADDementiaKognitive performanceSpermidine

Identifiers

PMID33211152
PMCPMC8116233
OpenAlexW3099161312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.