Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33211136›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2021

Does photobiomodulation influence the resting-state brain networks in young human subjects?

Hala El Khoury, John Mitrofanis, Luke A Henderson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hala El KhouryDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, Australia.
John MitrofanisDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, Australia. john.mitrofanis@sydney.edu.au.
Luke A HendersonDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging), we explored the effect of transcranial photobiomodulation on four major resting-state brain networks, namely the sensorimotor, salience, default mode and central executive networks, in normal young subjects. We used a vielight transcranial device (810 nm) and compared the scans in 20 subjects (mean age 30.0 ± 2.8 years) after active- and sham-photobiomodulation sessions. Four sets of analysis-independent components, network connectivity, infra-slow oscillatory power and arterial spin labelling-were undertaken. Our results showed that when comparing pre- with post-active and pre- with post-sham photobiomodulation scans, there were no substantial differences in activity across any of the four resting-state networks examined, indicating no clear photobiomodulation effect. When taken together with previous findings, we suggest that the impact of photobiomodulation becomes much clearer only after brain circuitry is altered, for example, after a neurone undergoes some change in its equilibrium or homeostasis, either during pathology or ageing, or during a change in functional activity when individuals are engaged in a specific task (e.g. evoked brain activity).

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingAdultAgingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetNeural PathwaysResearch Subjects810 nmFunctional magnetic resonance imagingResting-state brain networksTranscranial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.