Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33211112›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2020

Association of Circulating Tumor DNA With Disease-Free Survival in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Carolyn Cullinane, Christina Fleming, Donal Peter O'Leary, Fara Hassan, Louise Kelly, Martin J O'Sullivan, Mark Antony Corrigan, Henry Paul Redmond

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carolyn CullinaneDepartment of General and Breast Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Christina FlemingDepartment of General and Breast Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Donal Peter O'LearyDepartment of General and Breast Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Fara HassanDepartment of General and Breast Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Louise KellyDepartment of General and Breast Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Martin J O'SullivanDepartment of General and Breast Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Mark Antony CorriganDepartment of General and Breast Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Henry Paul RedmondDepartment of General and Breast Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Cork University Hospital · IEUniversity College Cork · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Fragmented DNA is continuously released into the circulation following apoptosis and necrosis of both cancerous and noncancerous cells; when it is released by cancer cells, it is specifically known as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Previous studies have suggested that ctDNA can reflect tumor burden and guide potential therapeutic targets. Objective: To determine the association of ctDNA with breast cancer disease-free survival (DFS) and progression-free survival in early, locally advanced, and metastatic breast cancer. Data Sources: An electronic search was conducted using the Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Embase from July 30, 2019, to October 31, 2019; all languages were included. The following search terms were used: ctDNA OR circulating tumor DNA OR liquid biopsy AND breast cancer OR breast carcinoma OR breast tumor AND prognosis OR survival. All titles were screened, and the appropriate abstracts were reviewed. If any data were missing, the authors contacted the study authors for permission to access data and extrapolate hazard ratios (HRs). Study Selection: To be included in the analysis, the studies had to meet the following prespecified inclusion criteria: (1) a ctDNA blood sample was measured; (2) DFS, progression-free survival, or relapse-free survival was reported as an HR; and (3) the patient population only had breast cancer. Retrospective and prospective observational cohort studies were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two authors (C.C. and C.F.) independently reviewed the literature. All data were recorded independently by both authors and were compared at the end of the reviewing process to limit selection bias. Duplicates were removed and any disparities were clarified. Data were pooled using a fixed-effects or random-effects model according to the study heterogeneity. This study adhered to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the association of ctDNA with DFS or relapse-free survival in breast cancer. Secondary outcomes focused on subgroup analysis in the setting of early breast cancer and metastatic breast cancer. Results: From a total of 263 publications found using the predefined search terms, data from 8 studies (3.0%) reporting on 739 patients in total were suitable for inclusion. Circulating tumor DNA gene variation detection (both before and after treatment) was statistically significantly associated with shorter DFS (HR, 4.44; 95% CI, 2.29-8.61; P < .001). Detection of ctDNA was statistically significantly associated with a reduction in DFS in both the early breast cancer subgroup (HR, 8.32; 95% CI, 3.01-22.99; P < .001) and the metastatic or locally advanced subgroup (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.35-2.71; P < .001). Pretreatment and posttreatment plasma sample collection was analyzed in both early and metastatic groups. The posttreatment group encompassed both surgical and oncologic therapy. Pretreatment plasma detection of ctDNA was statistically significantly associated with reduced DFS (HR, 3.30; 95% CI, 1.98-5.52; P < .001). Posttreatment sampling of ctDNA failed to achieve statistical significance (HR, 8.17; 95% CI, 1.01-65.89; P = .05). Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, elevated plasma ctDNA was associated with a high risk of relapse. This finding suggests that plasma ctDNA may provide an excellent method to stratify risk and personalize patient follow-up.

Indexed as

AftercareBreast NeoplasmsCirculating Tumor DNADisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingObservational Studies as TopicPrecision MedicinePrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID33211112
PMCPMC7677763
OpenAlexW3105223488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.