ArticleJAMA network open2020
Machine Learning-Guided Adjuvant Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
93 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognosing post-treatment outcomes of head and neck cancer using structured data and machine learning: A systematic review.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?-A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Development and Interpretation of a Clinicopathological-Based Model for the Identification of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer.Disease markers · 2023Trial
- Application of artificial intelligence in early warning, diagnosis and precise treatment of head and neck tumors (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Personalized Treatment Recommendation System in Head and Neck Cancer Using Survival Analysis and Deep Learning.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Toward a Better Paradigm for Head and Neck Cancer Treatment Applying AI (HNC-TACTIC): Protocol for an International Cohort Study of Electronic Health Records.JMIR research protocols · 2026Observational
- Development of a one-step office hysteroscopic lightweight artificial intelligence application for subfertility risk stratification of intrauterine adhesions.Fundamental research · 2026Article
- Review
- An interpretable survival benefit analytics framework for optimizing cancer treatment decision-making.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning-Based Multimodal Clinico-Histology-Genomic Prognostic Model in Prostate Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Application of Digital Medicine to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Head and Neck Tumors.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Prognostic benefit of preoperative radiotherapy for patients with metastatic larynx and hypopharynx cancers and XGBoost-based prognostic models to predict their survival.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- From Radical Resection to Precision Surgery: Integrating Diagnostic Biomarkers, Radiomics-Based Predictive Models, and Perioperative Systemic Therapy in Head and Neck Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Scoping Review.Clinical medicine & research · 2025Article
- Deep learning model outperforms traditional models in clinical data-based prognostic prediction for adult-type diffuse glioma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in head and neck cancer: a bibliometric and visualization analysis (1995-2025).Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based survival prediction model for adult diffuse low-grade glioma: a multi-cohort validation study.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Applications of flexible materials in health management assisted by machine learning.RSC advances · 2025Review
33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Postoperative chemoradiation is the standard of care for cancers with positive margins or extracapsular extension, but the benefit of chemotherapy is unclear for patients with other intermediate risk features. Objective: To evaluate whether machine learning models could identify patients with intermediate-risk head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who would benefit from chemoradiation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2016. Patients had resected disease and underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. Analysis was performed from October 1, 2019, through September 1, 2020. Patients were selected from the National Cancer Database, a hospital-based registry that captures data from more than 70% of newly diagnosed cancers in the United States. Three machine learning survival models were trained using 80% of the cohort, with the remaining 20% used to assess model performance. Exposures: Receipt of adjuvant chemoradiation or radiation alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients who received treatment recommended by machine learning models were compared with those who did not. Overall survival for treatment according to model recommendations was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included frequency of recommendation for chemotherapy and chemotherapy benefit in patients recommended for chemoradiation vs radiation alone. Results: A total of 33 527 patients (24 189 [72%] men; 28 036 [84%] aged ≤70 years) met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up in the validation data set was 43.2 (interquartile range, 19.8-65.5) months. DeepSurv, neural multitask logistic regression, and survival forest models recommended chemoradiation for 17 589 (52%), 15 917 (47%), and 14 912 patients (44%), respectively. Treatment according to model recommendations was associated with a survival benefit, with a hazard ratio of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.85; P < .001) for DeepSurv, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.77-0.90; P < .001) for neural multitask logistic regression, and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.98; P = .01) for random survival forest models. No survival benefit for chemotherapy was seen for patients recommended to receive radiotherapy alone. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that machine learning models may identify patients with intermediate risk who could benefit from chemoradiation. These models predicted that approximately half of such patients have no added benefit from chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.