Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33211108›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Machine Learning-Guided Adjuvant Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer.

Frederick Matthew Howard, Sara Kochanny, Matthew Koshy, Michael Spiotto, Alexander T Pearson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Frederick Matthew HowardSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Sara KochannySection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Matthew KoshyDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Michael SpiottoDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Alexander T PearsonSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
University of Chicago · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

BASIC RESEARCH TRAINING IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGYT32CA009566 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI OLUFUNMILAYO F. OLOPADE · 1987 to 2026
$10.5M
Multiscale Computational Models Guided By Emerging Cellular Dynamics Quantification For Predicting Optimum Immune Checkpoint And Targeted Therapy SchedulesU01CA243075 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JACKSON, TRACHETTE · 2020 to 2024
$2.6M
Viral Replication Pathways During Oral Tumorigenesis and Response to TherapyR01DE027445 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SPIOTTO, MICHAEL T · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
A reasoned approach to combination therapy development in head and neck cancerK08DE026500 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PEARSON, ALEXANDER THOMAS · 2016 to 2020
$800k
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009566NCI NIH HHS U01 CA243075NIDCR NIH HHS K08 DE026500NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE027445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Postoperative chemoradiation is the standard of care for cancers with positive margins or extracapsular extension, but the benefit of chemotherapy is unclear for patients with other intermediate risk features. Objective: To evaluate whether machine learning models could identify patients with intermediate-risk head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who would benefit from chemoradiation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2016. Patients had resected disease and underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. Analysis was performed from October 1, 2019, through September 1, 2020. Patients were selected from the National Cancer Database, a hospital-based registry that captures data from more than 70% of newly diagnosed cancers in the United States. Three machine learning survival models were trained using 80% of the cohort, with the remaining 20% used to assess model performance. Exposures: Receipt of adjuvant chemoradiation or radiation alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients who received treatment recommended by machine learning models were compared with those who did not. Overall survival for treatment according to model recommendations was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included frequency of recommendation for chemotherapy and chemotherapy benefit in patients recommended for chemoradiation vs radiation alone. Results: A total of 33 527 patients (24 189 [72%] men; 28 036 [84%] aged ≤70 years) met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up in the validation data set was 43.2 (interquartile range, 19.8-65.5) months. DeepSurv, neural multitask logistic regression, and survival forest models recommended chemoradiation for 17 589 (52%), 15 917 (47%), and 14 912 patients (44%), respectively. Treatment according to model recommendations was associated with a survival benefit, with a hazard ratio of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.85; P < .001) for DeepSurv, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.77-0.90; P < .001) for neural multitask logistic regression, and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.98; P = .01) for random survival forest models. No survival benefit for chemotherapy was seen for patients recommended to receive radiotherapy alone. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that machine learning models may identify patients with intermediate risk who could benefit from chemoradiation. These models predicted that approximately half of such patients have no added benefit from chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Chemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantDeep LearningOtorhinolaryngologic Surgical ProceduresPatient SelectionRadiotherapy, AdjuvantAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansHypopharyngeal NeoplasmsLaryngeal NeoplasmsLogistic ModelsLymph NodesMachine LearningMaleMouth Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33211108
PMCPMC7677764
OpenAlexW3100128679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.