ArticleJAMA network open2020
Association Between Wearable Device-Based Measures of Physical Frailty and Major Adverse Events Following Lower Extremity Revascularization.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a multidimensional physical function-focused frailty at risk index for early detection of functional decline in community-dwelling older adults.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Remote Monitoring of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Reveals Intrinsic Capacity in Older Adults.Gerontology · 2026Article
- Decoding Precision Aging: The Intersection of Cognitive Decline, Frailty, and Hormonal Biomarkers.Gerontology · 2025Article
- A 20-s Video-Based Assessment of Cognitive Frailty: Results from a Cohort Study within the Precision Aging Network.Gerontology · 2025Article
- Quantitative biomechanical analysis in validating a video-based model to remotely assess physical frailty: a potential solution to telehealth and globalized remote-patient monitoring.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Article
- The Application of Digital Frailty Screening to Triage Nonhealing and Complex Wounds.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Article
- Ethical considerations of digital health technology in older adult care.The lancet. Healthy longevity · 2024Article
- Cellular Senescence and Frailty in Transplantation.Current transplantation reports · 2023Article
- Review
- SCAI/ACR/APMA/SCVS/SIR/SVM/SVS/VESS Position Statement on Competencies for Endovascular Specialists Providing CLTI Care.Vascular medicine (London, England) · 2022Article
- Article
- Major Adverse Events in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease after Endovascular Revascularization: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Harnessing Digital Health to Objectively Assess Functional Performance in Veterans with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Gerontology · 2022Article
- Incorporating Outcomes that Matter to Older Adults into Surgical Research.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021Article
- A Wrist-Worn Sensor-Derived Frailty Index Based on an Upper-Extremity Functional Test in Predicting Functional Mobility in Older Adults.Gerontology · 2021Article
- Remote Physical Frailty Monitoring-The Application of Deep Learning-Based Image Processing in Tele-Health.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2020Article
- A Remote Diet and Exercise Intervention for Surgical Patients With Prefrailty and Frailty During the COVID-19 Pandemic.American journal of lifestyle medicineArticle
- SCAI/ACR/APMA/SCVS/SIR/SVM/SVS/VESS Position Statement on Competencies for Endovascular Specialists Providing CLTI Care.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Physical frailty is a key risk factor associated with higher rates of major adverse events (MAEs) after surgery. Assessing physical frailty is often challenging among patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) who are often unable to perform gait-based assessments because of the presence of plantar wounds. Objective: To test a frailty meter (FM) that does not rely on gait to determine the risk of occurrence of MAEs after revascularization for patients with CLTI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included 184 consecutively recruited patients with CLTI at 2 tertiary care centers. After 32 individuals were excluded, 152 participants were included in the study. Data collection was conducted between May 2018 and June 2019. Exposures: Physical frailty measurement within 1 week before limb revascularization and incidence of MAEs for as long as 1 month after surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The FM works by quantifying weakness, slowness, rigidity, and exhaustion during a 20-second repetitive elbow flexion-extension exercise using a wrist-worn sensor. The FM generates a frailty index (FI) ranging from 0 to 1; higher values indicate progressively greater severity of physical frailty. Results: Of 152 eligible participants (mean [SD] age, 67.0 [11.8] years; 59 [38.8%] women), 119 (78.2%) were unable to perform the gait test, while all could perform the FM test. Overall, 53 (34.9%), 58 (38.1%), and 41 (27.0%) were classified as robust (FI <0.20), prefrail (FI ≥0.20 to <0.35), or frail (FI ≥0.35), respectively. Within 30 days after surgery, 24 (15.7%) developed MAEs, either major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; 8 [5.2%]) or major adverse limb events (MALE; 16 [10.5%]). Baseline demographic characteristics were not significantly different between frailty groups. In contrast, the FI was approximately 30% higher in the group that developed MAEs (mean [SD] score, 0.36 [0.14]) than those who were MAE free (mean [SD] score, 0.26 [0.13]; P = .001), with observed MAE rates of 4 patients (7.5%), 7 patients (12.1%), and 13 patients (31.7%) in the robust, prefrail and frail groups, respectively (P = .004). The FI distinguished individuals who developed MACE and MALE from those who were MAE free (MACE: mean [SD] FI score, 0.38 [0.16]; P = .03; MALE: mean [SD] FI score, 0.35 [0.13]; P = .004) after adjusting by body mass index. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, measuring physical frailty using a wrist-worn sensor during a short upper extremity test was a practical method for stratifying the risk of MAEs following revascularization for CLTI when the administration of gait-based tests is often challenging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.