Observational studyJAMA ophthalmology2021
Insights From Survival Analyses During 12 Years of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Observational study in JAMA ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Eye (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Genome-wide analysis of genetic pleiotropy and causal genes across three age-related ocular disorders.Human genetics · 2023Pooled it
- Performance, Failures, and Oversight of a Large Language Model Agent for Clinical Data Analysis: Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Association of treated neovascular AMD with disability and mood disorders: A longitudinal nationwide study.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Article
- Baseline Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers Associated with the 2-Year Development of Macular Atrophy or Fibrosis in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Consensus on age-related macular degeneration course curricula for general ophthalmologists and non-ophthalmologist clinical staff: A Delphi study.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Article
- Intervention design for artificial intelligence-enabled macular service implementation: a primary qualitative study.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Disengagement and loss to follow-up in intravitreal injection clinics for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Visual and Anatomical Outcomes of a Single Intravitreal Dexamethasone in Diabetic Macular Edema: An 8 Year Real-World Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Anti-VEGF Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema in Denmark: Incidence, Burden of Therapy, and Forecasting Analyses.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Seven-year outcomes following intensive anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Characterising treatment outcomes of patients achieving quarterly aflibercept dosing for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: real-world clinical outcomes from a large tertiary care centre.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Treat & extend in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: how we got here and where do we go next?Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Predicting the immediate impact of national lockdown on neovascular age-related macular degeneration and associated visual morbidity: an INSIGHT Health Data Research Hub for Eye Health report.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Neovascular age-related macular degeneration without exudative recurrence over 24 months after initial remission.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Neovascular age-related macular degeneration in which exudation predominantly occurs as a subretinal fluid during anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Ocular Therapeutics and Molecular Delivery Strategies for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD).International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Survival Analysis vs Longitudinal Modeling With Multiple Imputation-A False Dichotomy.JAMA ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Predictors of Visual Acuity After Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration - Current Perspectives.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Review
- Ten-Year Incidence, Risk Factors and Progression Rate of Macular Atrophy in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Clinical & experimental ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Although multiple imputation models for missing data and the use of mixed-effects models generally provide better outcome estimates than using only observed data or last observation carried forward in clinical trials, such approaches usually cannot be applied to visual outcomes from retrospective analyses of clinical practice settings, also called real-world outcomes. Objective: To explore the potential usefulness of survival analysis techniques for retrospective clinical practice visual outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study covered a 12-year observation period at a tertiary eye center. Of 10 744 eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy between October 28, 2008, and February 1, 2020, 7802 eyes met study criteria (treatment-naive, first-treated eyes starting anti-VEGF therapy). Eyes were excluded from the analysis if they received photodynamic therapy or macular laser, any previous anti-VEGF therapy, treatment with anti-VEGF agents other than ranibizumab or aflibercept, or had an unknown date or visual acuity (VA) value at first injection. Main Outcomes and Measures: Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to consider VA reaching an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score of 70 (Snellen equivalent, 20/40) or better, duration of VA sustained at or better than 70 (20/40), and VA declining to 35 (20/200) or worse. Results: A total of 7802 patients (mean [SD] age, 78.7 [8.8] years; 4776 women [61.2%]; and 4785 White [61.3%]) were included in the study. The median time to attaining a VA letter score greater than or equal to 70 (20/40) was 2.0 years (95% CI, 1.87-2.32) after the first anti-VEGF injection. Predictive features were baseline VA (hazard ratio [HR], 1.43 per 5 ETDRS letter score or 1 line; 95% CI, 1.40-1.46), baseline age (HR, 0.88 per 5 years; 95% CI, 0.86-0.90), and injection number (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.10-1.15). Of the 4439 of 7802 patients (57%) attaining this outcome, median time sustained at an ETDRS letter score of 70 (20/40) or better was 1.1 years (95% CI, 1.1-1.2). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration beginning anti-VEGF therapy were more likely to experience positive visual outcomes within the first 2.0 years after treatment, typically maintaining this outcome for 1.1 years but then deteriorating to poor vision within 8.7 years. These findings demonstrate the potential usefulness of the proposed analyses. This data set, combined with the statistical approach for retrospective analyses, may provide long-term prognostic information for patients newly diagnosed with this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.