Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33211020›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Challenges and Strategies for Promoting Health Equity in Virtual Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review of Reviews.

Jamie Keiko Fujioka, Suman Budhwani, Tyla Thomas-Jacques, Kristina De Vera, Priyanka Challa, Kaitlin Fuller, Sophie Hogeveen, Dara Gordon, Simone Shahid, Emily Seto and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The rapid shift to virtual mental health care: Examining psychotherapy disruption by rurality status.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jamie Keiko FujiokaWomen's College Hospital, Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4942-6112
Suman BudhwaniWomen's College Hospital, Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6043-149X
Tyla Thomas-JacquesWomen's College Hospital, Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5915-3499
Kristina De VeraInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1656-0734
Priyanka ChallaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3406-7222
Kaitlin FullerUniversity of Toronto Libraries, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8315-187X
Sophie HogeveenWomen's College Hospital, Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6641-5773
Dara GordonWomen's College Hospital, Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3833-6891
Simone ShahidWomen's College Hospital, Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7673-2086
Emily SetoInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8723-5915
James ShawWomen's College Hospital, Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9522-0756
Women's College Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid virtualization of health services during the COVID-19 pandemic has drawn increasing attention to the impact of virtual care technologies on health equity. In some circumstances, virtual care initiatives have been shown to increase health disparities, as individuals from underserved communities are less likely to benefit from such initiatives.

objectiveThe purpose of this paper is to describe a protocol for a scoping review of reviews that aims to map review-level evidence that describes challenges and strategies for promoting effective engagement with virtual care technologies among underserved communities.

methodsOur methodology was adapted from seminal scoping review guidelines provided by Arksey and O'Malley, Levac at al, Colquhoun et al, and the Joanna Briggs Institute. Our search strategy was developed for the following databases: MEDLINE (on Ovid), EMBASE (on Ovid), CINAHL (on EBSCO), Scopus, and Epistemonikos. Supplementary searches will include the use of Google Scholar and reference tracking. Each citation will be independently screened by 2 researchers at the title and abstract level, and full-text screening will be performed in accordance with our eligibility criteria. The eligibility criteria focused on the inclusion of methods-driven reviews (ie, systematic reviews, scoping reviews, meta-analyses, realist reviews, and critical interpretative syntheses) to enhance rigor and quality. Other inclusion criteria included a focus on virtual care services that facilitate bidirectional patient-provider communication (ie, video, telephone, and asynchronous messaging visits) for underserved populations (ie, those who experience social disadvantage due to race, age, income, and other factors related to the social determinants of health).

resultsThis scoping review of reviews will provide a broad overview of identified challenges associated with the accessibility of virtual health care services among underserved communities. In addition, strategies for improving the access to, uptake of, and engagement with virtual care technologies among underserved communities will be identified. The knowledge synthesized from this review will aid in developing and implementing virtual services that acknowledge the unique needs of populations who experience barriers to care and disproportionately worse health outcomes. The results will also inform gaps in current research.

conclusionsThe rapid shift toward virtual health services has highlighted the urgent need to critically examine the intersection of virtual care and health equity. Although technology-driven innovations in health care generally aim to improve access, quality, and health outcomes, it is also possible for these innovations to produce intervention-generated inequities. Assessing current review-level evidence on the key challenges and strategies for improving the application of virtual care in underserved communities is imperative for ensuring that virtual care benefits all populations. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/22847.

Indexed as

Review Literature as TopicchallengeCOVID-19digital healthhealth equityscoping reviewstrategytelemedicinevirtual care

Identifiers

PMID33211020
PMCPMC7721627
OpenAlexW3089610294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.