ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2020
Facebook Support Groups for Rare Pediatric Diseases: Quantitative Analysis.
Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06548022 (Rare Group Problem Management Plus), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Rare Group Problem Management Plus
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Children with a rare congenital genetic disorder: a systematic review of parent experiences.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Pooled it
- Opportunities and pitfalls of social media research in rare genetic diseases: a systematic review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Pooled it
- Development, Implementation, and Preliminary Results of a Novel Social Network for Rare Disease Communities: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Lived Experiences of Patients With Rare Diseases and Healthcare System Barriers: A Phenomenological Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Social Media Use Among Parents and Caregivers of Children With Rare Genetic Diseases: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Understanding the Real Needs and Expectations of French Patients with Amelogenesis Imperfecta Through Facebook Content: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Parental Use of Social Media and the Internet in the Context of Their Child's Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorder: Mixed Methods Study Nested in the GenROC Cohort Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2025Article
- Medical Biases and Misconceptions Impact Diagnoses in Males With Loss of Function MECP2 Variants.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2025Article
- Identifying the Impacts, Obstacles and Information Barriers for Parents of Children Living With Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Observational
- Exploring the role of digital tools in rare disease management: An interview-based study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Rare disease narratives on social media: A content analysis.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
- Improving Social Media-Based Support Groups for the Rare Disease Community: Interview Study With Patients and Parents of Children with Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Social media and urology: The good, the bad and the ugly.Urologia · 2024Review
- Content analysis of patient support groups related to myositis on Facebook.Clinical rheumatology · 2024Article
- Myasthenia Gravis: utilising cross-platform quantitative content analysis to uncover and validate unmet needs.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Health-related quality of life in patients with diverse rare diseases: An online survey.Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
- Social Media Content Analysis of Public and Private Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) Deficiency Facebook Groups.Acta medica Philippina · 2024Article
- Pregnancy- and lactation-induced osteoporosis: a social-media-based survey.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Perspectives of Rare Disease Social Media Group Participants on Engaging With Genetic Counselors: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Advancing qualitative rare disease research methodology: a comparison of virtual and in-person focus group formats.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLoneliness, social isolation, and feeling disconnected from society are commonly experienced by parents of children with rare diseases and are, among others, important reasons for special supportive care needs. Social networking platforms are increasingly used for health communication, information exchange, and support. In the field of rare pediatric diseases, qualitative studies have shown that Facebook online support groups are utilized by and beneficial for persons affected by rare pediatric diseases. Nonetheless, the extent of this usage has not been investigated.
objectiveThis study aims to provide a comprehensive quantitative analysis of the extent of Facebook usage as a tool for rare pediatric disease support groups and to explore factors that influence a disease's representation on Facebook. These results potentially offer important insights for future public health initiatives and give direction to further research that can give much needed support to parents of children with rare diseases.
methodsWe determined rare pediatric diseases using the inventory of the online portal Orphanet. Facebook support groups were identified by searching 5 synonymous disease descriptions using the group category search bar. Disease- and group-describing parameters were statistically analyzed using standard descriptive statistical methods.
results6398 Facebook support groups, representing 826 diseases (19.5% of all searched diseases), were found. 69% are private groups. Group type, size, activity (sum of posts, comments, and reactions calculated by Facebook), new memberships, and language varied largely between groups (member count: minimum 1, maximum 23,414; activity last 30 days: minimum 0, maximum 3606). The highest percentage of awareness and information groups was found for teratogenic diseases (18/68, 26%). The odds of finding a Facebook group increased according to the level of information available about the disease: known prevalence (odds ratio [OR] 3.98, 95% CI 3.39-4.66, P<.001), known disease type (OR 3.15, 95% CI 2.70-3.68, P<.001), and known inheritance mode (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.68-2.52, P<.001) were all associated with higher odds of finding a Facebook group, as was dominant compared to nondominant inheritance (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.74-3.42, P<.001). The number of groups per disease increased with higher prevalence.
conclusionsFacebook is widely used as a tool for support groups for rare pediatric diseases and continues to be relevant. Two-thirds of the groups are private groups, indicating group participants' need for privacy, which should be further explored. The advantages and limitations of Facebook as a tool for support groups in the field of rare diseases should be further investigated as it will allow health professionals to use Facebook more meaningfully in their counseling and guidance of affected individuals and their family members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.