Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33210820›Full record

ArticleIntegrated environmental assessment and management2021

Soil Biodiversity: State-of-the-Art and Possible Implementation in Chemical Risk Assessment.

Cornelis Am van Gestel, Liesje Mommer, Luca Montanarella, Silvia Pieper, Mike Coulson, Andreas Toschki, Michiel Rutgers, Andreas Focks, Jörg Römbke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cornelis Am van GestelVrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5651-0208
Liesje MommerWageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3775-0716
Luca MontanarellaEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4176-3878
Silvia PieperGerman Environment Agency (UBA), Dessau-Roßlau, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3844-876X
Mike CoulsonERM, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Andreas Toschkigaiac, Research Institute for Ecosystem Analysis and Assessment, Aachen, Germany.
Michiel RutgersNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1509-9483
Andreas FocksWageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9031-0808
Jörg RömbkeECT Oekotoxikologie GmbH, Flörsheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1341-634X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protecting the structure and functioning of soil ecosystems is one of the central aims of current regulations of chemicals. This is, for instance, shown by the emphasis on the protection of key drivers and ecosystem services as proposed in the protection goal options for soil organisms by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Such targets require insight into soil biodiversity, its role in the functioning of ecosystems, and the way it responds to stress. Also required are tools and methodologies for properly assessing biodiversity. To address these issues, the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Europe 14

Indexed as

EcosystemSoilBiodiversityEuropeRisk AssessmentSoilChemical regulationsEcosystem servicesFunctional biodiversityProtection goalsStructural biodiversity

Identifiers

PMID33210820
PMCPMC8246784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.