Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33210795›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2021

Molecular Profiling of Exceptional Responders to Cancer Therapy.

Marijo Bilusic, Daniel Girardi, Yan Zhou, Kyungsuk Jung, Jianming Pei, Michael Slifker, Qingrong Chen, Daoud Meerzaman, Katherine Alpaugh, Denise Young and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The association of immunosurveillance and distant metastases in colorectal cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marijo BilusicFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1020-689X
Daniel GirardiGenitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Yan ZhouFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kyungsuk JungFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jianming PeiFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Michael SlifkerFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Qingrong ChenCenter for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Daoud MeerzamanCenter for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Katherine AlpaughFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Denise YoungFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Douglas FliederFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Phillip GrayRED Genomics, Inc., Carlsbad, California, USA.
Elizabeth PlimackFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fox Chase Cancer Center · USNational Institutes of Health · USCenter for Cancer Research · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
NIH Hematology Oncology Fellowship ProgramZIEBC010843 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HILL, ELIZABETH · 2009 to 2025
$104.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe vast majority of metastatic cancers cannot be cured. Palliative treatment may relieve disease symptoms by stopping or slowing cancer growth and may prolong patients' lives, but almost all patients will inevitably develop disease progression after initial response. However, for reasons that are not fully understood, a very few patients will have extraordinary durable responses to standard anticancer treatments. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed exceptional responders treated at Fox Chase Cancer Center between September 2009 and November 2017. An exceptional response was defined as a complete response lasting more than 1 year or a partial response or stable disease for more than 2 years. Tumor samples were analyzed using an Ambry Genetics test kit with a 142-gene panel. Messenger RNA expression was evaluated using NanoString's nCounter PanCancer Pathways Panel and Immune Profiling Panel and compared with matched controls for gender, age, and cancer type.

resultsTwenty-six exceptional responders with metastatic bladder, kidney, breast, lung, ovarian, uterine, and colon cancers were enrolled. Mutations were identified in 45 genes. The most common mutation was an EPHA5 nonsynonymous mutation detected in 87.5% of patients. Mutations in DNA damage repair pathway genes were also frequent, suggesting increased genome instability. We also found varying expression of 73 genes in the Pathways panel and 85 genes in the Immune Profiling panel, many of them responsible for improvement in tumor recognition and antitumor immune response.

conclusionsThe genomic instability detected in our exceptional responders, plus treatment with DNA damage compounds combined with favorable anticancer immunity, may have contributed to exceptional responses to standard anticancer therapies in the patients studied. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: With recent advances in the treatment of cancer, there is increased emphasis on the importance of identifying molecular markers to predict treatment outcomes, thereby allowing precision oncology. In this study, it was hypothesized that there is a "specific biologic signature" in the biology of the cancer in long-term survivors that allows sensitivity to systemic therapy and durability of response. Results showed that DNA damage repair pathway alterations, combined with favorable anticancer immunity, may have contributed to exceptional responses. It is very likely that an in-depth examination of outlier responses will become a standard component of drug development in the future.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsHumansMedical OncologyMolecular Targeted TherapyMutationPrecision MedicineDNA damage repairExceptional respondersGenomic instabilityImmune systemPrecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID33210795
PMCPMC7930427
OpenAlexW3103226890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.