ArticleThe oncologist2021
Molecular Profiling of Exceptional Responders to Cancer Therapy.
Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of rCCK96-104PE38 Targeted Drug in the General Surgical Treatment of Colon Cancer.BioMed research international · 2022Trial
- Enterotype-specific microbial biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor response revealed by large-scale integrated metagenomic analysis.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Article
- Durable Complete Remission of Metastatic Gastric Cancer Following Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Polygenic risk scores for autoimmune related diseases are significantly different in cancer exceptional responders.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- A case of metachronous oligo-hepatic and peritoneal metastases of pancreatic cancer with a favorable outcome after conversion surgery combined with perioperative sequential chemotherapy.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Case Report: The molecular fingerprint and the clinical implication of an exceptional response to neoadjuvant therapy in a metastatic cardia adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Eph receptors and ephrins in cancer progression.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024Review
- Whole Exome Sequencing of Thymoma Patients Exhibiting Exceptional Responses to Pemetrexed Monotherapy.Cancers · 2023Article
- Article
- Prognostic and predictive biomarkers for response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal adenocarcinoma.Biomarker research · 2022Article
- Clinical trial design in the era of precision medicine.Genome medicine · 2022Review
- Multiparametric quantitative phase imaging for real-time, single cell, drug screening in breast cancer.Communications biology · 2022Article
- The association of immunosurveillance and distant metastases in colorectal cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021Article
- DNA damage repair: historical perspectives, mechanistic pathways and clinical translation for targeted cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2021Review
- Robust principal component analysis for accurate outlier sample detection in RNA-Seq data.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe vast majority of metastatic cancers cannot be cured. Palliative treatment may relieve disease symptoms by stopping or slowing cancer growth and may prolong patients' lives, but almost all patients will inevitably develop disease progression after initial response. However, for reasons that are not fully understood, a very few patients will have extraordinary durable responses to standard anticancer treatments. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe analyzed exceptional responders treated at Fox Chase Cancer Center between September 2009 and November 2017. An exceptional response was defined as a complete response lasting more than 1 year or a partial response or stable disease for more than 2 years. Tumor samples were analyzed using an Ambry Genetics test kit with a 142-gene panel. Messenger RNA expression was evaluated using NanoString's nCounter PanCancer Pathways Panel and Immune Profiling Panel and compared with matched controls for gender, age, and cancer type.
resultsTwenty-six exceptional responders with metastatic bladder, kidney, breast, lung, ovarian, uterine, and colon cancers were enrolled. Mutations were identified in 45 genes. The most common mutation was an EPHA5 nonsynonymous mutation detected in 87.5% of patients. Mutations in DNA damage repair pathway genes were also frequent, suggesting increased genome instability. We also found varying expression of 73 genes in the Pathways panel and 85 genes in the Immune Profiling panel, many of them responsible for improvement in tumor recognition and antitumor immune response.
conclusionsThe genomic instability detected in our exceptional responders, plus treatment with DNA damage compounds combined with favorable anticancer immunity, may have contributed to exceptional responses to standard anticancer therapies in the patients studied. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: With recent advances in the treatment of cancer, there is increased emphasis on the importance of identifying molecular markers to predict treatment outcomes, thereby allowing precision oncology. In this study, it was hypothesized that there is a "specific biologic signature" in the biology of the cancer in long-term survivors that allows sensitivity to systemic therapy and durability of response. Results showed that DNA damage repair pathway alterations, combined with favorable anticancer immunity, may have contributed to exceptional responses. It is very likely that an in-depth examination of outlier responses will become a standard component of drug development in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.