Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33210270›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Clinical and Radiologic Predictors of a Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: Results of a Prospective Multi-center Study.

Aditi Bhatt, Pascal Rousset, Nazim Benzerdjeb, Praveen Kammar, Sanket Mehta, Loma Parikh, Gaurav Goswami, Sakina Shaikh, Vahan Kepenekian, Guillaume Passot and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aditi BhattDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Pascal RoussetDepartment of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France.
Nazim BenzerdjebDepartment of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France.
Praveen KammarDepartment Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Sanket MehtaDepartment Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Loma ParikhDepartment of Pathology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Gaurav GoswamiDepartment of Radiology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Sakina ShaikhDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Vahan KepenekianDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France.
Guillaume PassotDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France.
Olivier GlehenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France. olivier.glehen@chu-lyon.fr.
Hôpital Lyon Sud · FRCadila Healthcare (India) · INSaifee Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases who have a pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy experience a significantly longer survival than those with residual disease. This response is known only after surgery. This study aimed to examine clinical and radiologic predictors of a pCR.

methodsFrom July 2018 to December 2019, the study prospectively enrolled 120 patients. The clinical and radiologic findings were compared between patients with and without a pCR. A protocol for pathologic evaluation was followed.

resultsA pCR was observed in 34 patients (28.3%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that patients with a surgical Peritoneal Cancer Index (sPCI) of 3 or lower had an 80% probability of experiencing a pCR, and that patients with a radiologic PCI (rPCI) of 2 or lower had a 70% probability of experiencing a pCR. A pCR was correctly predicted for 47% of the patients by imaging and for 44.4% of the patients by surgical evaluation. The site of primary tumor, the timing of peritoneal metastasis (PM), histology, tumor marker positivity, and mutations in known poor prognostic genes (KRAS) did not differ between the patients with and those without pCR. The primary tumor showed residual disease in 23.5% and regional nodes in 26.4% of the patients with pCR.

conclusionsThe rPCI and sPCI concurred with a pCR in less than 50% of the patients. The patients with a lower PCI had greater concordance. An sPCI of 3 or lower was predictive of a pCR in 80% of the patients. The impact of KRAS mutations on pCR should be evaluated in a larger series. The predictors of pCR and response to systemic chemotherapy should be incorporated in prognostic scores used to select patients for surgery.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsHyperthermia, InducedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPeritoneal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyProspective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID33210270
OpenAlexW3105944358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.