Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33210236›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2021

A seven-nuclear receptor-based prognostic signature in breast cancer.

F Wu, W Chen, X Kang, L Jin, J Bai, H Zhang, X Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. International journal of general medicine · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

F WuAmbuiatory Surgery Treatment Department, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, 061001, Hebei Province, China.
W ChenDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Affiliated Hospital of North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, 063000, Hebei, China.
X KangUltrasound Department II, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, 061001, Hebei Province, China.
L JinDepartment of Thyroid and Mammary Gland III, Cangzhou Central Hospital, No. 16 Xinhua West Road, Yunhe District, Cangzhou, 061001, Hebei Province, China.
J BaiDepartment of Thyroid and Mammary Gland III, Cangzhou Central Hospital, No. 16 Xinhua West Road, Yunhe District, Cangzhou, 061001, Hebei Province, China.
H ZhangDepartment of Thyroid and Mammary Gland III, Cangzhou Central Hospital, No. 16 Xinhua West Road, Yunhe District, Cangzhou, 061001, Hebei Province, China.
X ZhangDepartment of Thyroid and Mammary Gland III, Cangzhou Central Hospital, No. 16 Xinhua West Road, Yunhe District, Cangzhou, 061001, Hebei Province, China. zhangxiaoyu93956466@21cn.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2200-4294

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer (BRCA) is a malignant cancer that threatened the life of female with unsatisfactory prognosis. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic nuclear receptors (NRs) signature of BRCA.

methodsBRCA patient samples were collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Consensus clustering analysis, univariate Cox regression analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis were performed to evaluate, select NRs as prognostic factors and build Risk Score model. GSEA analysis was explored to check signaling differences between High- and Low-Risk group. Nomogram model basing on age and Risk Score was established to predict the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival. Model performance was assessed by a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration plot. CIBERSORT, ESTIMATE and TIMER algorithm were introduced to evaluate the immune landscape.

resultsNR3C1, NR4A3, THRA, RXRG, NR2F6, NR1D2 and RORB were optimized as a prognostic signature for BRCA. This seven-NR-based Risk Score could effectively predict overall survival status. The area under the curve (AUC) of 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival are 0.702, 0.734 and 0.722 in TCGA training cohort, and 0.630, 0.721 and 0.823 in GEO validation cohort, respectively. Calibration plot demonstrated satisfactory agreement between predictive and observed outcomes. Nomogram model worked well on predicting survival probabilities. Multiple cancer-related pathways were highly enriched in High-Risk group. High- and Low-Risk groups showed significant differed immune cell infiltration. There exists an obvious connection between Risk Score and immune checkpoints LAG3, PD1 and TIM3.

conclusionThe seven-NR-based Risk Score represents a promising signature for estimating overall survival in patients with BRCA, and is correlated with the immune microenvironment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearSurvival RateReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearBRCALASSO coxNomogramNuclear receptorPrognosisRisk score

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.