Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33210217›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2021

Patients, family members and providers perceive family-administered delirium detection tools in the adult ICU as feasible and of value to patient care and family member coping: a qualitative focus group study.

Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Karla D Krewulak, Nubia Zepeda, Christian E Farrier, Krista L Spence, Judy E Davidson, Henry T Stelfox, Kirsten M Fiest

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03379129 (Validation of Family-Administered Delirium Detection Tools for the Identification of Delirium in Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03379129 completednot on this map

Validation of Family-Administered Delirium Detection Tools for the Identification of Delirium in Critically Ill Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2017 to 2018Enrolled147ConditionsDelirium
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Partnering is Paramount: Engaging Care Partners to Improve Delirium Identification.WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Jeanna Parsons LeighDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Karla D KrewulakDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Nubia ZepedaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Christian E FarrierDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Krista L SpenceDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Judy E DavidsonDepartment of Education, Development and Research, University of California, San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, USA.
Henry T StelfoxDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Kirsten M FiestDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. kmfiest@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7299-6594
Alberta Health Services · CAUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhile studies report on perceptions of family participation in delirium prevention, little is known about the use of family-administered delirium detection tools in the care of critically ill patients. This study sought the perspectives of patients, their family members, and healthcare providers on the use of family-administered delirium detection tools to detect delirium in critically ill patients and barriers and facilitators to using family-administered delirium detection tools in patient care.

methodsIn this qualitative study, critical care providers (five physicians, six registered nurses) and participants from the Family ICU Delirium Detection Study (seven past patients and family members) took part in four focus groups at one hospital in Calgary, Alberta.

resultsKey themes identified following thematic analysis from 18 participants included: 1) perceptions of acceptability of family-administered delirium detection (e.g., family feels valued, intensive care unit (ICU) care team may not use a family member's results, intensification of work load), 2) considerations regarding feasibility (e.g., insufficient knowledge, healthcare team buy-in), and 3) overarching strategies to support implementation into routine patient care (e.g., value of family-administered delirium detection for patients and families is well understood in the clinical context, regular communication between the family and ICU providers, an electronic version of the tool).

conclusionsPatients, family members and healthcare providers who participated in the focus groups perceived family participation in delirium detection and the use of family-administered delirium detection tools at the bedside as feasible and of value to patient care and family member coping.

trial registrationwww.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03379129); registered 15 December 2017.

Indexed as

DeliriumAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAlbertaFamilyFocus GroupsHumansIntensive Care Unitscritical caredeliriumfocus groupsICU

Identifiers

PMID33210217
PMCPMC7902561
OpenAlexW3106229679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.