ReviewBiophysical reviews2020
Recent advances in point spread function engineering and related computational microscopy approaches: from one viewpoint.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Universal point spread function engineering for 3D optical information processing.Light, science & applications · 2025Article
- Intelligent Beam Optimization for Light-Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy through Deep Learning.Intelligent computing (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Enhancing Light-Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy Illumination Beams through Deep Design Optimization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Machine-Learning-Based Single-Molecule Quantification of Circulating MicroRNA Mixtures.ACS sensors · 2023Article
- Deep learning in single-molecule imaging and analysis: recent advances and prospects.Chemical science · 2022Review
- Wavefront engineered light needle microscopy for axially resolved rapid volumetric imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Biophysical Reviews: 2020-looking back, going forward.Biophysical reviews · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This personal hybrid review piece, written in light of my recipience of the UIPAB 2020 young investigator award, contains a mixture of my scientific biography and work so far. This paper is not intended to be a comprehensive review, but only to highlight my contributions to computation-related aspects of super-resolution microscopy, as well as their origins and future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.