Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33210195›Full record

ArticleCurrent pain and headache reports2020

Patient Satisfaction in Academic Pain Management Centers: How Do We Compare?

Joseph Charles Gonnella, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Lynn Kohan

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current pain and headache reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph Charles GonnellaSidney Kimmel Medical College--Thomas Jefferson University, PA, Philadelphia, USA.
Alaa Abd-ElsayedDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Lynn KohanDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, 545 Ray C Hunt Drive Suite 3168, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA. lrk9g@virginia.edu.
Thomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Virginia · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe aim of the study was to investigate patient satisfaction amongst academic pain management centers and associated factors. RECENT

findingsApproximately 25% of pain management centers perform better than other practices on Press Ganey surveys. The majority of respondents (96%) indicated that pain management practices were uniquely positioned to receive poorer scores on patient satisfaction surveys. The majority of respondents (20/26), who reported a reason, indicated that limiting opioid prescribing led to poor patient satisfaction scores. Eighty-three percent of respondents indicated that they received pressure from administrators to improve patient satisfaction scores. The opioid epidemic in the USA must be addressed in order to diminish the senseless loss of life that is occurring in staggering numbers. The quality of care physicians provide has increasingly been assessed via patient satisfaction surveys. The results of these surveys often are utilized to provide financial incentives to physicians to obtain higher satisfaction scores. In the field of pain management, physicians may experience pressure to prescribe opioids in order to obtain higher patient satisfaction scores.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionPhysician ExecutivesPhysician's RoleSurveys and QuestionnairesAcademic Medical CentersAnalgesics, OpioidHumansPain ManagementPractice Patterns, Physicians'Analgesics, OpioidOpioid epidemicPatient satisfactionPrescribing habits

Identifiers

PMID33210195
OpenAlexW3105576519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.