Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33210146›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2020

Stochastic Gain and Loss of Novel Transcribed Open Reading Frames in the Human Lineage.

Daniel Dowling, Jonathan F Schmitz, Erich Bornberg-Bauer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DetectNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Emergence of antiphage functions from random sequence libraries reveals mechanisms of gene birth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel DowlingInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Germany.
Jonathan F SchmitzInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Germany.
Erich Bornberg-BauerInstitute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Germany.
Institute for Biodiversity · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to known genes, much of the human genome is transcribed into RNA. Chance formation of novel open reading frames (ORFs) can lead to the translation of myriad new proteins. Some of these ORFs may yield advantageous adaptive de novo proteins. However, widespread translation of noncoding DNA can also produce hazardous protein molecules, which can misfold and/or form toxic aggregates. The dynamics of how de novo proteins emerge from potentially toxic raw materials and what influences their long-term survival are unknown. Here, using transcriptomic data from human and five other primates, we generate a set of transcribed human ORFs at six conservation levels to investigate which properties influence the early emergence and long-term retention of these expressed ORFs. As these taxa diverged from each other relatively recently, we present a fine scale view of the evolution of novel sequences over recent evolutionary time. We find that novel human-restricted ORFs are preferentially located on GC-rich gene-dense chromosomes, suggesting their retention is linked to pre-existing genes. Sequence properties such as intrinsic structural disorder and aggregation propensity-which have been proposed to play a role in survival of de novo genes-remain unchanged over time. Even very young sequences code for proteins with low aggregation propensities, suggesting that genomic regions with many novel transcribed ORFs are concomitantly less likely to produce ORFs which code for harmful toxic proteins. Our data indicate that the survival of these novel ORFs is largely stochastic rather than shaped by selection.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularOpen Reading FramesAnimalsDNA, IntergenicHumansPrimatesTranscriptomeDNA, Intergenicde novo genesnovel genesorphan genesprimate genomicssmall ORFssmall proteins

Identifiers

PMID33210146
PMCPMC7674706
OpenAlexW3105446189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.