Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33210064›Full record

ArticleJBMR plus2020

Zoledronic Acid Is Not Equally Potent on Osteoclasts Generated From Different Individuals.

Anaïs M J Møller, Jean-Marie Delaisse, Jacob B Olesen, Troels Bechmann, Jonna S Madsen, Kent Søe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JBMR plus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Acute Effects of Kisspeptin Administration on Bone Metabolism in Healthy Men.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Isolation and Generation of Osteoclasts.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anaïs M J MøllerClinical Cell Biology Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark Vejle Denmark.
Jean-Marie DelaisseClinical Cell Biology Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark Vejle Denmark.
Jacob B OlesenClinical Cell Biology Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark Vejle Denmark.
Troels BechmannDepartment of Regional Health Research University of Southern Denmark Vejle Denmark.
Jonna S MadsenDepartment of Regional Health Research University of Southern Denmark Vejle Denmark.
Kent SøeClinical Cell Biology Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark Vejle Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7402-314X
University of Southern Denmark · DKOdense University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zoledronic acid is a bisphosphonate commonly used to treat bone diseases such as osteoporosis and cancer-induced bone disease. Patients exhibit a variable sensitivity to zoledronic acid; the underlying explanation for this remains unclear. The objective of this study was to obtain more knowledge in this regard. We hypothesized that osteoclasts generated from different individuals would show a variable sensitivity to zoledronic acid in vitro. Osteoclasts were generated using monocytes from 46 healthy female blood donors (40 to 66 years). Matured osteoclasts were reseeded onto bone slices precoated with different concentrations of zoledronic acid. IC50 values were determined based on total eroded bone surface after 3 days of resorption. The IC50 for inhibition of osteoclastic bone resorption varied from 0.06 to 12.57μM zoledronic acid; thus, a more than 200-fold difference in sensitivity to zoledronic acid among osteoclasts from different individuals was observed. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that the determined IC50 correlated with smoking status, and the average number of nuclei per osteoclast in vitro. Further analyses showed that: (i) increasing protein levels of mature cathepsin K in osteoclast cultures rendered the osteoclasts less sensitive to zoledronic acid; (ii) surprisingly, neither the gene nor the protein expression of farnesyl diphosphate synthase was found to correlate with the IC50; and (iii) trench-forming osteoclasts were found to be more sensitive to zoledronic acid than pit-forming osteoclasts within the same cell culture. Thus, we conclude that there indeed is a high degree of variation in the potency of zoledronic acid on osteoclasts when generated from different individuals. We propose that our findings can explain some of the varying clinical efficacy of zoledronic acid therapy observed in patients, and may therefore be of clinical importance, which should be investigated in a clinical trial combining in vitro and in vivo investigations. © 2020 The Authors.

Indexed as

ANTIRESORPTIVESOSTEOCLASTSOSTEOPOROSISTUMOR‐INDUCED BONE DISEASE

Identifiers

PMID33210064
PMCPMC7657394
OpenAlexW3085063343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.