ArticleBioactive materials2021
A 3D-bioprinted scaffold with doxycycline-controlled BMP2-expressing cells for inducing bone regeneration and inhibiting bacterial infection.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- A near-infrared regulated programmable multi-mode periosteum scaffold for sequential healing of infected bone defects.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Biomaterial-assisted gene therapy for bone repair.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Advances in Composite Bioactive Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone Repair: Implications for Oral Surgery.Brazilian dental journal · 2026Review
- Functionalization of 3D printed PLGA-based scaffolds for bone regeneration.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Engineering a BMP2-risedronate complex with sustained release for osteoporosis therapy.Archives of pharmacal research · 2025Article
- Bone Morphogenetic Proteins in Orthopedics: A Bibliometric Analysis.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Applications of Tailored Mesoporous Silicate Nanomaterials in Regenerative Medicine and Theranostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Designer mammalian living materials through genetic engineering.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Addressing the challenges of infectious bone defects: a review of recent advances in bifunctional biomaterials.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Programmed Transformation of Osteogenesis Microenvironment by a Multifunctional Hydrogel to Enhance Repair of Infectious Bone Defects.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Biomaterials-based approaches to mandibular tissue engineering: where we were, where we are, where we are going.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Anti-Infection Efficacy, Osteogenesis Potential, and Biocompatibility of 3D Printed PLGA/Nano-Hydroxyapatite Porous Scaffolds Grafted with Vancomycin/DOPA/rhBMP-2 in Infected Rabbit Bone Defects.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Article
- Targeting Bacteria-Induced Ferroptosis of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Promote the Repair of Infected Bone Defects.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Drug-Loaded Bioscaffolds for Osteochondral Regeneration.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Three-Dimensional Bioprinting: A Comprehensive Review for Applications in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Engineering mesoporous bioactive glasses for emerging stimuli-responsive drug delivery and theranostic applications.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Integrating bioprinting, cell therapies and drug delivery towards in vivo regeneration of cartilage, bone and osteochondral tissue.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024Review
- Biomaterial scaffolds in maxillofacial bone tissue engineering: A review of recent advances.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Structure-optimized and microenvironment-inspired nanocomposite biomaterials in bone tissue engineering.Burns & trauma · 2024Review
- Bioprinting of gelatin-based materials for orthopedic application.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large bone defects face a high risk of pathogen exposure due to open wounds, which leads to high infection rates and delayed bone union. To promote successful repair of infectious bone defects, fabrication of a scaffold with dual functions of osteo-induction and bacterial inhibition is required. This study describes creation of an engineered progenitor cell line (C3H10T1/2) capable of doxycycline (DOX)-mediated release of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP2). Three-dimensional bioprinting technology enabled creation of scaffolds, comprising polycaprolactone/mesoporous bioactive glass/DOX and bioink, containing these engineered cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.