Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33209972›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2020

CCCDTD5 recommendations on early and timely assessment of neurocognitive disorders using cognitive, behavioral, and functional scales.

David F Tang-Wai, Eric E Smith, Marie-Andrée Bruneau, Amer M Burhan, Atri Chatterjee, Howard Chertkow, Samira Choudhury, Ehsan Dorri, Simon Ducharme, Corinne E Fischer and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Culturally sensitive CLEAR guidelines on disclosing and communicating a diagnosis of dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

David F Tang-WaiDepartment of Medicine, Divisions of Neurology and Geriatric Medicine University of Toronto, University Health Network Memory Clinic, Krembil Brain Institute Toronto Ontario Canada.
Eric E SmithDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences and Hotchkiss Brain Institute University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.
Marie-Andrée BruneauDepartment of Psychiatry and Addictology University of Montreal, Geriatric Institute of Montreal Research Center Montreal Quebec Canada.
Amer M BurhanDepartment of Psychiatry Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry Western University and Parkwood Institute-Mental Health London Ontario Canada.
Atri ChatterjeeDivision of Neurology University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada.
Howard ChertkowDepartment of Medicine Neurology Rotman Research Institute University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Samira ChoudhuryCentre for Addiction and Mental Health University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Ehsan DorriDepartment of Psychiatry University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.
Simon DucharmeDepartment of Psychiatry, Montreal QC, McConnell Brain Imaging McGill University Health Centre McGill University, Montreal Neurological Institute Montreal Quebec Canada.
Corinne E FischerKeenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science St. Michael's Hospital Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Sheena GhodasaraDepartment of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry Western University London Ontario Canada.
Nathan HerrmannSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Department of Psychiatry University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Ging-Yuek Robin HsiungDivision of Neurology University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada.
Sanjeev KumarCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Robert LaforceClinique Interdisciplinaire de Mémoire Département des Sciences Neurologiques CHU de Québec, Université Laval Quebec Canada.
Linda LeeDepartment of Family Medicine McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Fadi MassoudCentre Hospitalier Charles LeMoyne and Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Department of Medicine University of Sherbrooke and Department of Medicine University of Montreal Montreal Quebec Canada.
Kenneth I ShulmanSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Department of Psychiatry University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Michael StiffelUniversité de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke Quebec Canada.
Serge GauthierMcGill Center for Studies in Aging Alzheimer Disease Research Unit Montreal Quebec Canada.
Zahinoor IsmailDepartments of Psychiatry Clinical Neurosciences, Community Health Sciences Hotchkiss Brain Institute and O'Brien Institute for Public Health University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEarlier diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders and neurodegenerative disease is needed to implement preventative interventions, minimize harm, and reduce risk of exploitation in the context of undetected disease. Along the spectrum from subjective cognitive decline (SCD) to dementia, evidence continues to emerge with respect to detection, staging, and monitoring. Updates to previous guidelines are required for clinical practice.

methodsA subcommittee of the 5th Canadian Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia (CCCDTD) reviewed emerging evidence to address the following: (1) Is there a role for screening at-risk patients without clinical concerns? In what context is assessment for dementia appropriate? (2) What tools can be used to evaluate patients in whom cognitive decline is suspected? (3) What important information can be gained from an informant, using which measures? (4) What instruments can be used to get more in-depth information to diagnose mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia? (5) What is the approach to those with cognitive concerns but without objective changes (ie, SCD)? (6) How do we track response to treatment and change over time? The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to rate quality of the evidence and strength of the recommendations.

resultsWe recommend instruments to assess and monitor cognition, behavior, and function across the cognitive spectrum, including reports from patient and informant. We recommend against screening asymptomatic older adults but recommend investigation for self- or informant reports of changes in cognition, emergence of behavioral or psychiatric symptoms, or decline in function or self-care. Standardized assessments should be used for cognitive and behavioral change that have sufficient validity for use in clinical practice. DISCUSSION: The CCCDTD5 provides evidence-based recommendations for detection, assessment, and monitoring of neurocognitive disorders. Although these guidelines were developed for use in Canada, they may also be useful in other jurisdictions.

Indexed as

behaviorcase findingdementiadetectionfunctionguidelinesmild cognitive impairmentneuropsychiatric symptomsSCDscreening

Identifiers

PMID33209972
PMCPMC7657153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.