Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33209804›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2020

Flipped classroom versus traditional lecture in training undergraduates in pediatric epilepsy.

Vandana Arya, Virender Kumar Gehlawat, Radhamohan Rana, Jayashankar Kaushik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vandana AryaDepartment of Pediatrics, Pt. BD Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Virender Kumar GehlawatDepartment of Pediatrics, Pt. BD Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Radhamohan RanaDepartment of Pediatrics, BPS Government Medical College for Women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India.
Jayashankar KaushikDepartment of Pediatrics, Pt. BD Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPedagogical constructs such as flipped classroom are used to engage students in the learning process by their active participation. The aim of the present study was to compare the two models of flipped classroom and traditional lecture in training undergraduates in pediatric epilepsy.

methodsThe study was conducted among the 3

resultsThere was a significant increase in posttest scores when compared to pretest scores in both the groups. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) difference in scores for epilepsy diagnosis was comparable in Group I (3.33 [2.3]) and Group II (2.46 [2.17]) (

conclusionFlipped classroom model resulted in better scores than the traditional teaching method for training undergraduates in the management of epilepsy in children. This teaching-learning method could be adopted in training of primary care physicians.

Indexed as

Epilepsy trainingmedical educationmedical teacherprofessional competence

Identifiers

PMID33209804
PMCPMC7652203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.