ReviewJournal of family medicine and primary care2020
Cesarean bladder injury - obstetrician's nightmare.
Review in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating a novel approach to placenta accreta spectrum management: the modified Triple-P technique with cystoinflation (a randomized controlled trial).Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Management of unspecified abdominal pain and its complications: A case reports.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Prevalence and Risk Associated With Bladder Injuries During Caesarean Section in a Secondary Care Hospital.Cureus · 2024Article
- The urological complications of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) - a literature review.Journal of medicine and lifeReview
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urinary bladder is an adjacent viscus susceptible for intraoperative injury during cesarean section (CS). Prolonged labor, scarred uterus, intraabdominal adhesion, emergency CS, advanced labor, cesarean hysterectomy etc., are the predisposing factors for bladder injury during CS. While operating on such conditions, one should be meticulous to explore the possibility of bladder injury. Family physician practicing community obstetrics should be aware of this and know how to tackle this. Usually the dome of the bladder is injured and the trigonal area remains away from the injury field by 6-10 cm. Bladder rent is repaired in two layers either by continuous simple or interrupted suture with 3-0 & 2-0 polyglycolic acid suture. Suprapubic cystostomy and transurethral catheter are kept for 10-14 days. While postoperative adhesion, CS during full dilatation of cervix, abnormal anatomy etc., may not proceed for negligence, bladder injury in normal patients and unrecognized intraoperative bladder injury may attract penalty from the consumer court.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.