Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33209751›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of food safety2020

Application of the Micro Biological Survey analytical method for the determination of bacterial load in cow raw milk.

Alessandra Cornacchia, Maria Antonietta Saletti, Violeta Di Marzio, Romolo Salini, Cristina Marfoglia, Elga Tieri, Nicola D'Alterio, Nicla Marri, Francesca Losito, Alyexandra Arienzo and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of food safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandra CornacchiaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise G. Caporale, Teramo.
Maria Antonietta SalettiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise G. Caporale, Teramo.
Violeta Di MarzioIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise G. Caporale, Teramo.
Romolo SaliniIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise G. Caporale, Teramo.
Cristina MarfogliaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise G. Caporale, Teramo.
Elga TieriIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise G. Caporale, Teramo.
Nicola D'AlterioIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise G. Caporale, Teramo.
Nicla MarriIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana M. Aleandri, Rome.
Francesca LositoIstituto Nazionale Biostrutture e Biosistemi - Consorzio Interuniversitario, Rome.
Alyexandra ArienzoDipartimento di Scienze, Università degli Studi Roma Tre, Rome Italy.
Lorenza MurgiaDipartimento di Scienze, Università degli Studi Roma Tre, Rome Italy.
Giovanni AntoniniIstituto Nazionale Biostrutture e Biosistemi - Consorzio Interuniversitario, Rome.
Simonetta AmatisteIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana M. Aleandri, Rome.
Loris LeboffeIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana M. Aleandri, Rome.
Francesco PomilioIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise G. Caporale, Teramo.
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise G. Caporale · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana · ITIstituto Nazionale Biostrutture e Biosistemi · ITRoma Tre University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of "Micro Biological Survey - MBS Test" in the enumeration of bacterial load in cow raw milk. The MBS test is based on a colorimetric method recently developed and patented by "Roma Tre" University, Italy. The evaluation of the performance of the MBS method was carried out by comparison with plate count at 30°C (gold standard) and flow cytometry. Thirteen independent set of experiments were performed analyzing a total of 104 samples of cow raw milk with the selected methods. Results obtained using the MBS method are comparable with those obtained with the plate count method at 30°C (CFU/mL) and flow cytometry technology; in particular, the results obtained with the MBS method are very close to plate count's at 30°C. On the other hand, there are statistically significant differences between these two methods' and flow cytometry technology's results that could be due to the different experimental conditions.

Indexed as

Bactoscan FCCow raw milkFlow citometryMBS testPlate count at 30°C (CFU/mL)

Identifiers

PMID33209751
PMCPMC7656179
OpenAlexW3096893464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.