ArticleTranslational pediatrics2020
Application of vocal organ correction combined with language training in the rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy and language disorder.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo explore the effect of vocal organ correction combined with language training on the rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy (CP) and language disorder.
methodsA total of 98 children with CP and language disorder were divided into two groups (49 cases in each group) using a random number table: the control group and the test group. The control group was given language training alone, while the test group received vocal organ correction combined with language training. The changes in language function classification, efficacy, and family satisfaction before and after the treatments were compared.
resultsA significant difference was identified in language function classification between the two groups before and after treatment (P<0.05). The language function classification of the two groups was also significantly different after treatment (P<0.05), as was the distribution of clinical efficacy between the two groups (P<0.05). The total effective rate for the test group was 91.84%, which was higher than the 73.47% for the control group (P<0.05). Family satisfaction between the two groups differed significantly (P<0.05), and the total satisfaction rate of families in the test group was 87.76%, which was higher than the 69.39% in the control group (P<0.05).
conclusionsVocal organ correction combined with language training can improve the language function of children with CP and language disorder, has ideal efficacy, and can also enhance family satisfaction during rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.