Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33209722›Full record

ArticleTranslational pediatrics2020

Attitudes and concerns of neonatologists and nurses to family-integrated-care in neonatal intensive care units in China.

Xiying Xiang, Shiwen Xia, Xing Zhu, Xiangyu Gao, Xirong Gao, Aiming Zhang, Shoo K Lee, Mingyan Hei

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Alberta family integrated careFrontiers in pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiying XiangNeonatal Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shiwen XiaDepartment of Neonatology, Hubei Province Women and Children Hospital, Wuhan, China.
Xing ZhuDepartment of Pediatrics, the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiangyu GaoDepartment of Pediatrics, Southeast University Affiliated Xuzhou Hospital, Xuzhou, China.
Xirong GaoDepartment of Neonatology, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha, China.
Aiming ZhangDepartment of Pediatrics, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, China.
Shoo K LeeMaternal-Infant Care Research Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mingyan HeiNeonatal Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Children’s Hospital · CNHubei Provincial Women and Children's Hospital · CNHunan Children's Hospital · CNHunan Provincial People's Hospital · CNMount Sinai Hospital · CANational Center for Women and Children’s Health, China CDC · CNSoutheast University · CNThird Xiangya Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParents in China are denied visitation of their newborns in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), leading to a prolonged period of parent-infant separation. The family-integrated care (FICare) model, which supports the integration of parents into the NICU team, is gradually being introduced in China. Considering resistance to the implementation of FICare, this study aimed to assess the attitudes and concerns of neonatologists and nurses towards FICare in China.

methodsUsing a before and after study design, a qualitative analysis was conducted to determine the perceptions and attitudes of medical professionals towards FICare in China. A total of 34 neonatologists and 94 nurses from 5 tertiary NICUs in China were enrolled. A self-developed questionnaire was used. The study steps included reading session and then survey for the first time (survey 1), a FICare getting buy-in education session (4 hours), a group discussion session, and finally repeat the questionnaire (survey 2). The surveys were completed by trained researchers regarding willingness, acceptance and concerns of implementing FICare in NICUs in China. Differences in attitudes towards FICare were compared between groups (Chi-square/correction for continuity).

resultsThere are positive responses in neonatologists and nurses regarding the necessity (Survey 1: 58.8% and 57.4%; Survey 2: 88.2% and 67.0%), feasibility (Survey 1: 17.6% and 19.1%; Survey 2: 32.3% and 34.0%), and interest in joining FICare (Survey 1: 82.4% and 83.0%; Survey 2: 97.1% and 85.1%). A higher proportion of neonatologists indicated that FICare could promote breastfeeding in the NICU comparing to nurses (Survey 1: 47.1%

conclusionsThe getting buy-in education program in introducing new paradigms of neonatal care may help on how to design and implement more effective educational tools for FICare.

Indexed as

AttitudeChinaconcernsfamily-integrated-care (FICare)neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)

Identifiers

PMID33209722
PMCPMC7658773
OpenAlexW3083560519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.