ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2020
The clinical research of 1,470 nm laser in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thulium laser-based hemostasis during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective observational multicentric study.International urology and nephrology · 2025Observational
- A retrospective analysis on the effect of single-channel minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with retrograde flexible ureteroscopy using the completely lateral decubitus and semi-lithotomy positions to treat complex kidney stones.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPercutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the primary method for the treatment of renal calculi. The preservation of the nephrostomy tube after operation brings severe pain to the patients. We use a 1,470 nm semiconductor laser to stop bleeding after the operation, which cannot reserve the nephrostomy tube, fully reflect its safety and effectiveness, and provide a new method for clinical practice.
methodsForty-two patients with renal stones who came to our hospital from March 2016 to September 2019 were randomly divided into two groups: laser operation group (20 patients) and traditional operation group (22 patients). The stone removal rate, surgical effect, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.
resultsThere was no significant difference in the stone clearance rate between the two groups at the 4th week after operation (P>0.05). However, the incidence of postoperative infection, incision pain, and massive bleeding in the laser surgery group were lower than those in the traditional surgery group (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in urine extravasation and postoperative hematuria between the two groups (P>0.05). The average postoperative hospital stay in the laser surgery group was shorter than that in the traditional surgery group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Simultaneously, there was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and medical expenses between the two groups (P>0.05).
conclusionsThe 1,470 nm laser is safe, effective, and feasible in PCNL operation, especially in hemostasis of the renal puncture channel, and it is worth popularizing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.