Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33209648›Full record

ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2020

A narrative review of digital pathology and artificial intelligence: focusing on lung cancer.

Taro Sakamoto, Tomoi Furukawa, Kris Lami, Hoa Hoang Ngoc Pham, Wataru Uegami, Kishio Kuroda, Masataka Kawai, Hidenori Sakanashi, Lee Alex Donald Cooper, Andrey Bychkov and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. PathoEye: A deep learning framework for the whole-slide image analysis of skin tissue.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Taro SakamotoDepartment of Pathology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Tomoi FurukawaDepartment of Pathology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Kris LamiDepartment of Pathology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Hoa Hoang Ngoc PhamDepartment of Pathology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Wataru UegamiDepartment of Pathology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan.
Kishio KurodaDepartment of Pathology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Masataka KawaiDepartment of Pathology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Hidenori SakanashiConfigurable Learning Mechanism Research Team, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Lee Alex Donald CooperDepartment of Pathology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Andrey BychkovDepartment of Pathology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan.
Junya FukuokaDepartment of Pathology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Nagasaki University · JPKameda Medical Center · JPNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JPNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Yamanashi · JP

Funding

Informatics Tools for Quantitative Digital Pathology Profiling and Integrated Prognostic ModelingU01CA220401 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI COOPER, LEE, FLOWERS, CHRISTOPHER R · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA220401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of whole slide imaging technology allows for pathology diagnosis on a computer screen. The applications of digital pathology are expanding, from supporting remote institutes suffering from a shortage of pathologists to routine use in daily diagnosis including that of lung cancer. Through practice and research large archival databases of digital pathology images have been developed that will facilitate the development of artificial intelligence (AI) methods for image analysis. Currently, several AI applications have been reported in the field of lung cancer; these include the segmentation of carcinoma foci, detection of lymph node metastasis, counting of tumor cells, and prediction of gene mutations. Although the integration of AI algorithms into clinical practice remains a significant challenge, we have implemented tumor cell count for genetic analysis, a helpful application for routine use. Our experience suggests that pathologists often overestimate the contents of tumor cells, and the use of AI-based analysis increases the accuracy and makes the tasks less tedious. However, there are several difficulties encountered in the practical use of AI in clinical diagnosis. These include the lack of sufficient annotated data for the development and validation of AI systems, the explainability of black box AI models, such as those based on deep learning that offer the most promising performance, and the difficulty in defining the ground truth data for training and validation owing to inherent ambiguity in most applications. All of these together present significant challenges in the development and clinical translation of AI methods in the practice of pathology. Additional research on these problems will help in resolving the barriers to the clinical use of AI. Helping pathologists in developing knowledge of the working and limitations of AI will benefit the use of AI in both diagnostics and research.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencedeep learningpathologyremote diagnosiswhole slide imaging

Identifiers

PMID33209648
PMCPMC7653145
OpenAlexW3081081614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.