ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2020
Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of a ctDNA methylation classifier for incidental lung nodules: protocol for a prospective, observational, and multicenter clinical trial of 10,560 cases.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03651986 (Diagnostic and Monitoring Significance of Circulating Tumor DNA), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnostic and Monitoring Significance of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Methylation Analysis by Next-Generation Sequencing in Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Nodules
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accurate diagnosis of pulmonary nodules using a noninvasive DNA methylation test.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021Trial
- Pulmonary nodules: classification, biomarkers, signaling pathways, diseases, early diagnosis and management.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of lung cancer in a population with incidental pulmonary nodules in China: a prospective multicenter study of 10,560 cases.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026Article
- Advances in modelling the risk of benign and malignant lung nodules.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Effects ofHeliyon · 2024Article
- Repeated pulmonary nodules as the primary symptom of familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in adults: a case report and review.The Journal of international medical research · 2023Article
- Circulating Tumor DNA-A Novel Biomarker of Tumor Progression and Its Favorable Detection Techniques.Cancers · 2022Review
- Combination of CT and telomerase+ circulating tumor cells improves diagnosis of small pulmonary nodules.JCI insight · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung nodules are a diagnostic challenge. Current clinical management of lung nodule patients is inefficient and therefore causes patient misclassification, which increases healthcare expenses. However, a precise and robust lung nodule classifier to minimize discomfort for patients and healthcare costs is still lacking. The aim of the present protocol is to evaluate the effectiveness of using a liquid biopsy classifier to diagnose nodules compared to physician estimates and whether the classifier can reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies in benign cases.
methodsA prospective cohort of 10,560 patients enrolled at 23 clinical centers in China with non-calcified pulmonary nodules, ranging from 0.5 to 3 cm in diameter, indicated by LDCT or CT will be included. After signed consent forms, the participants' pulmonary nodules will be assessed using three evaluation tools: (I) physician cancer probability estimates (II) validated lung nodule risk models, including Mayo Clinic and Veteran's Affairs models (III) ctDNA methylation classifier previously established. Each patient will undergo LDCT/CT follow-ups for 2 to 3 years and their information and one blood sample will be collected at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. The primary study outcomes will be the diagnostic accuracy of the methylation classifier in the cohort. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) will be used to compare the diagnostic value of each testing tool in differentiating benign and malignant pulmonary nodules. DISCUSSION: We are conducting an observational study to explore the accuracy of using a ctDNA methylation classifier for incidental lung nodules diagnosis.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT03651986.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.