Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33209532›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Occupational-Related Contact Dermatitis: Prevalence and Risk Factors Among Healthcare Workers in the Al'Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Omar B Alluhayyan, Bashair K Alshahri, Abdulrahman M Farhat, Sulaiman Alsugair, Jihan J Siddiqui, Khaled Alghabawy, Ghaida B AlQefari, Waleed O Alolayan, Izzat A Abu Hashem

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hand Eczema in Apprentice Nurses during the COVID-19 Pandemic after a Skin Prevention Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impact in Contact Dermatitis during and after SARS-CoV2 Pandemic.Current treatment options in allergy · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Omar B AlluhayyanMedicine, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU.
Bashair K AlshahriMedicine, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Khobar, SAU.
Abdulrahman M FarhatMedicine, Sulaiman Al Rajhi University, Qassim, SAU.
Sulaiman AlsugairMedicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU.
Jihan J SiddiquiMedicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Khaled AlghabawyMedicine, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU.
Ghaida B AlQefariMedicine, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU.
Waleed O AlolayanNursing, Alrras General Hospital, Qassim, SAU.
Izzat A Abu HashemFamily Medicine, Primary Health Care Center - As Sulimaniyah, Qassim, SAU.
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAKing Abdulaziz University · SAPrimary Health Care · QAKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAQassim University · SASulaiman Al Rajhi Colleges · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to estimate and investigate the prevalence and the risk factors implicated in contact dermatitis among healthcare workers in the Al'Qassim region, Saudi Arabia, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methodology We conducted a cross-sectional survey among healthcare workers at hospitals in the Al'Qassim region. Data was collected using a standardized and validated Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire version 2002. We included 408 participants in the analysis. Results The majority of the respondents (66.7%) were females. The mean age of participants was 34 (SD: ±9) years. Most of the participants who reported contact dermatitis were nurses (58.6%). Direct patient care roles represent 78% of participants. Respondents who work 40-50 hours per week represent 61.5% of the sample. The most commonly recorded symptoms were dryness (92.9%), itchiness (50%), and redness (46.4%) of the skin. The most affected site was hand 93.5%. Hand cleanser was the commonest substance implicated in the worsening of the skin changes (59.2%). Protective glove material that worsens contact dermatitis, such as natural rubber/latex, represents 76% of responses. A significant association (p=0.001)was seen in the occurrence of contact dermatitis in those with a history of allergic eye symptoms (33.3%) and those without (58%). Participants with a mean age of 26.47 years were more prone to develop contact dermatitis (CI: 1.19-7.06; p=0.067). Pharmacists and interns had 3.69 and 4.90 times higher odds of having contact dermatitis (CI: 0.95-7.33; CI: 22.1; p=0.027; p=0.038, respectively). Those involved in patient education and research activities at work were 6.48 (p=0.017) and 20.51 (p=0.024) times likely to develop contact dermatitis (CI: 1.38-30.31; CI: 1.49-282.15, respectively). Conclusions We explored the prevalence and risk factors for occupational contact dermatitis among healthcare workers in Saudi Arabia. The prevalence of reported skin changes during the pandemic was 46.4%. Our study also showed that the risk factors of developing contact dermatitis include female gender, history of eye allergies, and young age group.

Indexed as

contact dermatitiscovid-19healthcare workersoccupational disease

Identifiers

PMID33209532
PMCPMC7667620
OpenAlexW3092797483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.