Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33209509›Full record

ArticleForensic sciences research2020

Experience with postmortem computed tomography in the forensic analysis of the November 2015 Paris attacks.

Laura W de Jong, Laurence Legrand, Tania Delabarde, Ghazi Hmeydia, Myriam Edjlali, Lilia Hamza, Joseph Benzakoun, Catherine Oppenheim, Bertrand Ludes, Jean-François Meder

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic sciences research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Age and sex estimation using post-mortem CT scout view.International journal of legal medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laura W de JongDepartment of Neuroradiology, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences - Sainte-Anne Hospital, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Laurence LegrandDepartment of Neuroradiology, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences - Sainte-Anne Hospital, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Tania DelabardePôle Universitaire d'Imagerie Post-Mortem, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6331-5526
Ghazi HmeydiaDepartment of Neuroradiology, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences - Sainte-Anne Hospital, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Myriam EdjlaliDepartment of Neuroradiology, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences - Sainte-Anne Hospital, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Lilia HamzaPôle Universitaire d'Imagerie Post-Mortem, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Joseph BenzakounDepartment of Neuroradiology, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences - Sainte-Anne Hospital, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Catherine OppenheimDepartment of Neuroradiology, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences - Sainte-Anne Hospital, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Bertrand LudesPôle Universitaire d'Imagerie Post-Mortem, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Jean-François MederDepartment of Neuroradiology, GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences - Sainte-Anne Hospital, Université de Paris, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID33209509
PMCPMC7646581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.