Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33209504›Full record

ArticleForensic sciences research2020

Terrorist attacks: cutaneous patterns of gunshot and secondary blast injuries.

Yann Delannoy, Isabelle Plu, Isabelle Sec, Tania Delabarde, Marc Taccoen, Antoine Tracqui, Bertrand Ludes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic sciences research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Interpol review of forensic firearm examination 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yann DelannoyInstitut Médico-Légal de Paris, Paris, France.
Isabelle PluInstitut Médico-Légal de Paris, Paris, France.
Isabelle SecInstitut Médico-Légal de Paris, Paris, France.
Tania DelabardeInstitut Médico-Légal de Paris, Paris, France.
Marc TaccoenInstitut Médico-Légal de Paris, Paris, France.
Antoine TracquiService de médecine légale, CHRU Besançon-Hôpital Saint-Jacques, Besançon, France.
Bertrand LudesInstitut Médico-Légal de Paris, Paris, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRHôpital Saint-Jacques · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Terrorist attacks have been on the rise. During the recent terrorist attacks in France, terrorists perpetrated their acts using weapons of war, as well as explosive charges. These two modes of action, when combined, can create skin lesions with similar macroscopic appearances, which can sometimes go unnoticed because of body fragmentation. A total of 68 autopsies, 83 external examinations, 140 standard radiographic examinations, and 49 computed tomography (CT) scans were performed over 7 days during the 2015 terrorist attacks in France. Bodies were injured by firearms and shrapnel-like projectiles. We analysed the clinical findings for the secondary blast cutaneous lesions from the explosive devices and compared these lesions with ballistic-related lesions to highlight that patterns can be macroscopically similar on external examination. Secondary blast injuries are characterised by penetrating trauma associated with materials added to explosive systems that are propelled by explosive air movement. These injuries are caused most often by small, shrapnel-like metallic objects, such as nails and bolts. Propulsion causes ballistic-type injuries that must be recognised and distinguished from those caused by firearm projectiles. Differentiating between these lesions is very difficult when using conventional criteria (size, shape, number and distribution on the body) with only external examination of corpses. This is why the particularities of these lesions must be further illustrated and then confirmed by complete autopsies and radiological and anatomopathological examinations.Key pointsWhen occurring simultaneously in terrorist attacks, injuries caused by secondary blasts appear as cutaneous wound patterns that can be macroscopically very similar to those caused by firearm projectiles.The criteria usually found in the literature for distinguishing these two types of projectiles may be difficult to use.It is important in these difficult situations to benefit from systematic postmortem imaging.Systematic autopsy and then anatomopathological analyses of the orifices also help determine the cause of the wounds.

Indexed as

blast injuriesexplosive agentsforensic medicineForensic sciencesgunshot woundssuicide

Identifiers

PMID33209504
PMCPMC7646566
OpenAlexW3038905273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.