ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2020
Comparison between B-mode ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the surveillance of early stage pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The efficiency of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) combined with EUS elastography for pancreatic cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Pooled it
- Utilization of lymph node elastography in the axillary staging of breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Deep learning radiomics based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound images for assisted diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis.BMC medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CE-US) brings a higher signal-to-noise ratio and a higher sensitivity for slow flow than traditional B-mode ultrasonography (US). However, it remains unclear whether CE-US is also superior to B-mode US in detecting early-stage pancreatic cancer (PC).
methodsThis was a retrospective study enrolling patients suspected of pancreatic insufficiency between June 2015 and December 2019. Enrolled patients successively received B-mode US and CE-US examinations, and some their demographic and clinical data were collected. The diagnostic capacity of the two examinations was calculated and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was used to compare the area under the curve (AUC). A subgroup analysis was performed to explore the effects of tumor size on the diagnostic accuracy of B-mode US and CE-US.
resultsThere were 128 patients enrolled in this study; 74 patients were diagnosed as early-stage PC patients and the remaining 54 were diagnosed with benign pancreatic lesions. The mean size of the PC was 17.8±4.9 mm. The results revealed that 68 of the 74 PC patients were correctly diagnosed by CE-US, and all 54 patients with benign pancreatic lesions were also correctly diagnosed. Meanwhile, only 55 of the 74 PC patients and 50 of the 54 patients with benign pancreatic lesions were diagnosed correctly using B-mode US. The ROC curve showed that the AUCs of CE-US and B-mode US were 0.959 and 0.835, respectively. According to the subgroup analysis, CE-US exhibited better accuracy than B-mode US for smaller tumors (size <20 mm, P=0.002; size <10 mm, P=0.043; size <5 mm, P=0.025).
conclusionsCE-US was clearly superior to the conventional B-mode US in detecting early-stage PC, especially smaller sized PC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.