Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33209480›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2020

Factors associated with worse outcomes for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors in radical versus local resections.

Osayande Osagiede, Elizabeth Habermann, Courtney Day, Emmanuel Gabriel, Amit Merchea, Riccardo Lemini, Iktej S Jabbal, Dorin T Colibaseanu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of Endoscopic Methods for Rectal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Low Malignant Potential: A Network Meta-analysis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Osayande OsagiedeDepartment of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY, USA.
Elizabeth HabermannDivision of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Courtney DayDivision of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Emmanuel GabrielDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, FL, USA.
Amit MercheaDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, FL, USA.
Riccardo LeminiDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, FL, USA.
Iktej S JabbalDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, FL, USA.
Dorin T ColibaseanuDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, FL, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USJacobi Medical Center · US

Funding

ZESTRIL VS. VERAPAMIL IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSIONM01RR000585 · NCRR · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RIZZA, ROBERT A. · 1985 to 2006
$30.4M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002379 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI NILUFER ERTEKIN-TANER · 2017 to 2026
$14.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002379NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are the most common NETs of the gastrointestinal tract. Due to the rarity, colorectal NETs are understudied and are not clearly understood. Our study sought to identify the factors associated with worse outcomes for colorectal NETs following resection.

methodsWe identified patients diagnosed with colorectal NETs [2004-2014] who underwent resection from the National Cancer Data Base. Non-NETs were excluded. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using the Kaplan Meier method. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models were used to assess factors associated with radical versus local resection, OS and LOS.

resultsA total of 7,967 colon and 11,929 rectal NETs were analyzed. The majority of colon (93.4%) and rectal (89.1%) NETs underwent radical and local resection respectively. The 5-year OS was 69% and 92% for colon and rectal NETs respectively. Older age (OR 1.45, CI 1.37-1.53) and clinical stage 4 (OR 9.91, CI 4.56-21.52) were associated with higher odds for colonic radical resection. Lowest median income quartile (OR 1.41, CI 1.21-1.64) and African Americans (OR 1.26, CI 1.07-1.49) experienced higher mortality for colon and rectal NETs respectively.

conclusionsRacial minority and low-income patients experience worse outcomes for colorectal NETs following resection.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerendoscopic resectionNational Cancer Data Baseneuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC)Neuroendocrine neoplasmsneuroendocrine tumors (NETs)outcomesradical resection

Identifiers

PMID33209480
PMCPMC7657829
OpenAlexW3093201384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.