ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2020
Feasibility of thoracoscopic pulmonary bullectomy using a transareolar approach for treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Periareolar approach in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for right middle lobectomy: a novel technique.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Trial
- A prospective comparative study of thoracoscopic transareolar and uniportal approaches for young male patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is a common disease among young patients, particularly men. While the most common thoracoscopic approach is triportal, the transareolar approach is rare. In this study, we prospectively investigated the feasibility of thoracoscopic pulmonary bullectomy using a transareolar approach for treatment of PSP.
methodsTen patients with PSP who underwent thoracoscopic transareolar pulmonary bullectomy were prospectively enrolled in this study between September 2017 and March 2018. For all 10 patients, we evaluated the perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, recurrence, wound-related pain, and cosmetic satisfaction regarding the surgical wound.
resultsThe mean patient age was 18.9±4.2 years; three patients were affected on the right side and seven patients were affected on the left side. Bullae and blebs were localized at the apex of the affected lung in all patients. All procedures were completed using a transareolar approach without additional ports or conversion to thoracotomy in any patient. The mean operative time was 39.8±8.6 min. The mean volume of blood lost during surgery was extremely small in all patients. The duration of postoperative drainage was 1 day, while the length of postoperative hospital stay was 2 days in all patients. No morbidities or recurrence of PSP occurred during the study period. The mean cosmetic satisfaction scores of the surgical wound were 3.3 and 3.2 on postoperative day (POD) 7 and at postoperative month (POM) 12. The mean NRS score was 1.5 on POD 7. All patients were pain-free at POM 12.
conclusionsTransareolar thoracoscopic pulmonary bullectomy for treatment of PSP is feasible and safe, with a high degree of satisfaction for postoperative pain and cosmetics. This new approach could be a novel option for surgical treatment of PSP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.