ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2020
On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery for multi-vessel coronary revascularization.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Melatonin ameliorates inflammation and improves outcomes of ischemia/reperfusion injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a randomized placebo-controlled study.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025Trial
- Case Report: Staged surgical management in ESRD: off-pump CABG followed by renal transplantation to enhance graft survival.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Blood Products Utilization Status in Off-Pump Cardiac Surgery Patients.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2023Article
- Article
- Non-Inferiority of Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement in the TAVR Era: David versus Goliath.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Risk Score for Predicting Long-Term Mortality Following Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- The relationship between aortic calcification on chest radiograph and neurocognitive impairment after coronary artery bypass grafting.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to compare the operative and postoperative results of on-pump (ONCAB) and off-pump (OPCAB) coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) for multi-vessel coronary revascularization (≥4 anastomoses).
methodsFrom May 2018 to August 2019, a total of 120 patients (22.5% women, mean age 61.5±8.4 years) received either ONCAB (Group 1, n=60) or OPCAB (Group 2, n=60) for multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Preoperative left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) was 53.1%±8.4%. Median EuroSCORE II was 1.59 (interquartile range, 1.01-2.54). The median number of performed coronary anastomoses was 4 (interquartile range, 4-5), with equal distribution in both groups (P=0.4). All procedures were performed by highly experienced surgeons. The primary endpoints were overall survival at 30 days and freedom from severe adverse events (SAE), which included myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery re-operation, and re-thoracotomy, caused by bleeding and stroke.
resultsThe overall survival in both groups was 100% with no intraoperative OPCAB-to-on-pump conversion. The median procedure time was 169 min (interquartile range, 150-179 min) for Group 1 and 183 min (interquartile range, 169-205 min) for Group 2 (P<0.001). The overall freedom from SAE numbered 93.3% (98.3%
conclusionsONCAB showed superior freedom from SAE and shorter procedure times when compared to OPCAB for multi-vessel coronary artery revascularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.